§

P*I*E Nationwide, Inc.

295 N.L.R.B. 382 (N.L.R.B. 1989)
P*I*E Nationwide, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. City Disposal Systems, Inc.

    465 U.S. 822 (1984)   Cited 206 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a "lone employee's invocation of a right grounded in his collective-bargaining agreement is . . . a concerted activity in a very real sense" because the employee is in effect reminding his employer of the power of the group that brought about the agreement and that could be reharnessed if the employer refuses to respect the employee's objection

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Interboro Contractors, Inc.

    388 F.2d 495 (2d Cir. 1967)   Cited 80 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Interboro Contractors, Inc., 388 F.2d 495, 500 (2d Cir. 1967), the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit stated that the efforts of an individual employee acting alone to enforce the provisions of a collective bargaining agreement may be deemed "concerted," and thus protected, at least when the individual's interpretation of the agreement has a reasonable basis.

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Sea-Land Service, Inc.

    837 F.2d 1387 (5th Cir. 1988)   Cited 1 times

    No. 86-4653. February 26, 1988. Linda Dreeben, Atty., Elliott Moore, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Victoria A. Higman, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Robert J. Attaway, Wagner, Heine, Underberg, Manley, Myerson Casey, New York City, Ann E. Isaac, Sea-Land Corp., Edison, N.J., for respondent. Application For Enforcement Of An Order Of The National Labor Relations Board. Before BROWN, REAVLEY, and JOLLY, Circuit Judges. JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge: The Board, over the dissent of Chairman

  6. Viracon, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    736 F.2d 1188 (7th Cir. 1984)   Cited 1 times

    No. 83-2134. Nos. 83-2134, 83-2424. Argued February 24, 1984. Decided June 20, 1984. As Amended July 26, 1984. Allen E. Christy, Jr., Hadlick Hoedeman, P.C., Minneapolis, Minn., for petitioner. Patrick Szymanski, Elliott Moore, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the NLRB. Before WOOD and COFFEY, Circuit Judges, and HENLEY, Senior Circuit Judge. The Honorable J. Smith Henley, Senior Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit, is sitting by

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Fla. Tile Co., Div. of Sikes Corp.

    692 F.2d 34 (6th Cir. 1982)   Cited 1 times

    Nos. 81-1402, 81-1467. November 2, 1982. John M. Breckenridge, Jr., Greene, Mann, Rowe, Stanton, Mastry Burton, Greene, Mann, Rowe, Stanton, Mastry Burton, Tampa, Fla., for respondent/cross-petitioner. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate General Counsel, John P. Coyle, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner/cross-respondent. Before ENGEL and KEITH, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. ORDER This case is before the court upon application of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement

  8. Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest

    26 U.S.C. § 6621   Cited 1,874 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions