Phoenix Newspapers, Inc.

13 Cited authorities

  1. May Stores Co. v. Labor Board

    326 U.S. 376 (1945)   Cited 257 times
    Requiring "a clear determination by the Board of an attitude of opposition to the purposes of the Act to protect the rights of employees generally"
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ford

    170 F.2d 735 (6th Cir. 1948)   Cited 49 times

    No. 10605. November 15, 1948. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of an order of the board against Wilbur H. Ford and others, doing business as Ford Brothers. Decree of enforcement granted. Harold Cranefield, of Detroit, Mich., and Robert N. Denham, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., of Washington, D.C. (David P. Finding, Ruth Weyand, and Thomas F. Maher, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner

  3. Time-O-Matic, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    264 F.2d 96 (7th Cir. 1959)   Cited 32 times

    No. 12424. March 5, 1959. Edward B. Miller, Merrill Shepard, Willis S. Ryza, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner, Time-O-Matic, Inc. Pope Ballard, Chicago, Ill., of counsel, for petitioner. Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Atty., Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Fred S. Landess, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before DUFFY, Chief Judge and HASTINGS and PARKINSON, Circuit Judges. HASTINGS, Circuit Judge. Petitioner

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Illinois Tool Works

    153 F.2d 811 (7th Cir. 1946)   Cited 47 times
    Noting that the test for violations of sec. 8, now codified as sec. 8, of the NLRA is whether "the employer engaged in conduct which, it may reasonably be said, tends to interfere with the free exercise of employee rights under the Act," and that actual or successful coercion need not be shown in order for the Board to find a violation
  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Clausen

    188 F.2d 439 (3d Cir. 1951)   Cited 23 times

    No. 10374. Argued March 6, 1951. Filed April 2, 1951. Rehearing Denied June 8, 1951. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel (Fannie M. Boyls, and Samuel M. Singer, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for National Labor Relations Board. Irving Herman, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Conrad A. Falvello, Hazelton, Pa., for respondent. Rocco C. Falvello, Hazleton, Pa., on the brief, for respondent-appellee. Before MARIS, McLAUGHLIN

  6. Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    120 F.2d 641 (D.C. Cir. 1941)   Cited 33 times

    Nos. 7503, 7538. Argued February 17, 1941. Decided May 12, 1941. On Petition to Review and Set Aside an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the Bethlehem Steel Company and another to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board, wherein the Plan of Employees' Representation at the Steelton, Pa., Plant of the Bethlehem Steel Company and another intervened in support of the petition and the Steel Workers Organizing Committee intervened in support of the order

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Minnotte Manufacturing Corporation

    299 F.2d 690 (3d Cir. 1962)   Cited 4 times

    No. 13680. Argued December 21, 1961. Decided February 27, 1962. Rosanna A. Blake, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Melvin J. Welles, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Vincent M. Casey, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Margiotti Casey, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for respondent. Before McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER and HASTIE, Circuit Judges. HASTIE, Circuit

  8. National Labor Rel. Board v. Ohio Calcium Co.

    133 F.2d 721 (6th Cir. 1943)   Cited 21 times

    No. 9217. February 19, 1943. Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order against the Ohio Calcium Company. Decree in accordance with opinion. Fannie M. Boyls, of Washington, D.C. (Robert B. Watts, Ernest A. Gross, Howard Lichtenstein, Ruth Weyand, and Fannie M. Boyls, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Robert T. Caldwell, of Ashland, Ky. (Robert T. Caldwell and Porter M

  9. Travis v. Schwartz Manufacturing Co.

    216 F.2d 448 (7th Cir. 1954)   Cited 8 times

    Nos. 10995-10996. November 4, 1954. Timothy T. Cronin, U.S. Atty., Howard W. Hilgendorf, Asst. U.S. Atty., Milwaukee, Wis., Edward V. Ryan, U.S. Atty., Jersey City, N.J., Harry M. Leet, Atty., Dept. of Labor, Washington, D.C., for Travis. John W. Emmerling, Milwaukee, Wis., John P. Nash, Manitowoc, Wis., for Schwartz. Before MAJOR, FINNEGAN and LINDLEY, Circuit Judges. MAJOR, Circuit Judge. This action was instituted June 18, 1948, by plaintiff (petitioner), Harrison G. Travis, under the Army Reserve

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. United Biscuit Co.

    208 F.2d 52 (8th Cir. 1953)   Cited 7 times

    No. 14829. November 19, 1953. Rehearing Denied December 10, 1953. Bernard Dunau, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., and H.T. Herrick, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, on the brief), for petitioner. Harold A. Thomas, Jr., St. Louis, Mo. (N.W. Hartman, and Fordyce, Mayne, Hartman, Renard Stribling, St. Louis, Mo., on the brief), for

  11. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,110 times   35 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"