Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance Co.

18 Cited authorities

Board v. Hearst Publications
322 U.S. 111 (1944) Cited 792 times 8 Legal Analyses
Determining whether newsboys were independent contractors or employees under the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA")
U.S. v. Underwriters Assn
322 U.S. 533 (1944) Cited 629 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding the antitrust laws applicable to the business of insurance
Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.
312 U.S. 426 (1941) Cited 507 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"
Republic Steel Corp. v. Labor Board
311 U.S. 7 (1940) Cited 232 times 3 Legal Analyses
In Republic Steel, supra, the Court refused to enforce an order requiring the employer to pay the full amount of back pay to an employee who had been paid to work for the Work Projects Administration in the meantime.
Polish Alliance v. Labor Board
322 U.S. 643 (1944) Cited 138 times
In Polish National Alliance v. NLRB, 322 U.S. 643, 64 S.Ct. 1196, 88 L.Ed. 1509 (1944), the Court held that the National Labor Relations Act applied to a fraternal organization providing death, disability and accident benefits to its members and their beneficiaries.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Chicago Apparatus Co.
116 F.2d 753 (7th Cir. 1941) Cited 35 times
In National Labor Relations Board v. Chicago Apparatus Co., 116 F.2d 753, 756, and National Labor Relations Board v. Howell Chevrolet Co., 204 F.2d 79, 83, cases cited and relied upon by the defendant, such a written designation had been obtained.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Suburban Lumber Co.
121 F.2d 829 (3d Cir. 1941) Cited 27 times
In National Labor Relations Board v. Suburban Lumber Co., 3 Cir., 121 F.2d 829 (1941), the de minimis doctrine was urged to defeat the Board's jurisdiction.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Am. Potash C. Corp.
98 F.2d 488 (9th Cir. 1938) Cited 25 times
In NLRB v. American Potash Chemical Corp., 98 F.2d 488 (9th Cir. 1938), our court remarked, "The Act makes it clear that the proceedings [such as here involved] must proceed with the utmost dispatch."
J.L. Brandeis Sons v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
142 F.2d 977 (8th Cir. 1944) Cited 18 times
No. 12782. June 7, 1944. On Petition to Review and Set Aside Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by J.L. Brandeis Sons, a Nebraska corporation, to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board, and a request by the Board for enforcement of this order. Order affirmed and decree enforcing it entered. Ralph E. Svoboda, of Omaha, Neb. (J.A.C. Kennedy, Yale C. Holland, George L. DeLacy, Kennedy, Holland, DeLacy Svoboda, L.J. Tierney, and Harry R. Henatsch, all of
National Labor Rel. Board v. J.L. Hudson Co.
135 F.2d 380 (6th Cir. 1943) Cited 16 times
No. 9379. April 15, 1943. Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order against the J.L. Hudson Co. Petition for enforcement of order allowed. Philip G. Phillips, of Cincinnati, Ohio (Robert B. Watts, Ernest A. Gross, Howard Lichtenstein, David Findling, and John E. Lawyer, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Hal H. Smith, of Detroit, Mich. (Hal H. Smith, Archibald Broomfield

Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance Co.

18 Cited authorities

Determining whether newsboys were independent contractors or employees under the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA")

Holding the antitrust laws applicable to the business of insurance

Holding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"

In Republic Steel, supra, the Court refused to enforce an order requiring the employer to pay the full amount of back pay to an employee who had been paid to work for the Work Projects Administration in the meantime.

In Polish National Alliance v. NLRB, 322 U.S. 643, 64 S.Ct. 1196, 88 L.Ed. 1509 (1944), the Court held that the National Labor Relations Act applied to a fraternal organization providing death, disability and accident benefits to its members and their beneficiaries.

In National Labor Relations Board v. Chicago Apparatus Co., 116 F.2d 753, 756, and National Labor Relations Board v. Howell Chevrolet Co., 204 F.2d 79, 83, cases cited and relied upon by the defendant, such a written designation had been obtained.

In National Labor Relations Board v. Suburban Lumber Co., 3 Cir., 121 F.2d 829 (1941), the de minimis doctrine was urged to defeat the Board's jurisdiction.

In NLRB v. American Potash Chemical Corp., 98 F.2d 488 (9th Cir. 1938), our court remarked, "The Act makes it clear that the proceedings [such as here involved] must proceed with the utmost dispatch."