Peter Paul, Inc.
3 Cited authorities
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.
395 U.S. 575 (1969) Cited 1,035 times 67 Legal AnalysesHolding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
N.L.R.B. v. Peter Paul, Inc.
467 F.2d 700 (9th Cir. 1972) Cited 6 timesNo. 71-1397. August 1, 1972. Rehearing Denied November 14, 1972. Charles Steele, Atty. (argued), William Wachter, Joseph E. Mayer, Attys., Dominic L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Atty. Gen., Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Roy O. Hoffman, Director, NLRB, Region 20, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Robert J. Scolnik (argued), San Francisco, Cal., Marvin S. Siegel (argued), Menlo Park, Cal., Norman Leonard, San Francisco, Cal., Robert B. Snow, Jr.
National Labor Relations Bd. v. J.I. Case Co.
201 F.2d 597 (9th Cir. 1953) Cited 22 timesIn National Labor Relations Bd. v. Case Co. (201 F.2d 597, 600), in a situation arising under the National Labor Relations Act, the court pointed out that: "no statutory purpose would be served by requiring formal proof at the hearing of the substantiality of the Union's claim to representation or by permitting the contending parties to litigate such issue at the hearing.