Perry Norvell Co.

10 Cited authorities

  1. United States v. White

    322 U.S. 694 (1944)   Cited 603 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination “is a purely personal one” that “cannot be utilized by or on behalf of any organization, such as a corporation”
  2. Brotherhood of Carpenters v. U.S.

    330 U.S. 395 (1947)   Cited 320 times
    Reversing conspiracy convictions because trial court did not include instruction reflecting § 6 of the Norris LaGuardia Act, which limited imputed liability of officer, member or organization "participating or interested in a labor dispute," and stating that "a judge may not direct a verdict of guilty no matter how conclusive the evidence"
  3. Labor Board v. Fansteel Corp.

    306 U.S. 240 (1939)   Cited 281 times
    In Fansteel, the Board awarded reinstatement with backpay to employees who engaged in a "sit down strike" that led to confrontation with local law enforcement officials.
  4. United Mine Workers v. Coronado Co.

    259 U.S. 344 (1922)   Cited 411 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that labor union could be sued for antitrust violations and describing the "affirmative legal recognition of their existence and usefulness and provisions for their protection"
  5. Labor Board v. Sands Mfg. Co.

    306 U.S. 332 (1939)   Cited 139 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Sands Mfg. Co., 306 U.S. 332, 59 S.Ct. 508, 83 L.Ed. 682, affirming the ruling of this Court in 6 Cir., 96 F.2d 721, the Supreme Court held the employer justified in abandoning further negotiations with the Union when conditions showed the uselessness of continuing with them.
  6. Eagle Glass Mfg. Co. v. Rowe

    245 U.S. 275 (1917)   Cited 38 times

    APPEAL FROM AND CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 23. Submitted December 18, 1916. Decided December 10, 1917. In a suit to restrain alleged concerted wrongful conduct upon the part of officials of a labor union, a temporary injunction should not be granted against those who were not served and did not submit themselves to the jurisdiction. The bill alleged that the answering defendants had constituted other persons named as defendants their agents and representatives

  7. Fife v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

    356 Pa. 265 (Pa. 1947)   Cited 53 times

    October 7, 1946. March 24, 1947. Torts — Conspiracy — Evidence — Simultaneous assertion by persons of same right. 1. Proof of conspiracy must be made by full, clear and satisfactory evidence. [267] 2. The mere fact that two or more persons, each with the right to do a thing, happen to do that thing at the same time is not by itself an actionable conspiracy. [267] Argued October 7, 1946. Before MAXEY, C. J., DREW, LINN, STERN, PATTERSON, STEARNE and JONES, JJ. Appeals, Nos. 144 to 150, incl., March

  8. Malloy v. Carroll

    287 Mass. 376 (Mass. 1934)   Cited 45 times
    In Malloy v. Carroll, it was said: "In actions based on wrongful conduct of the defendant, where the wrong is of such a character that the proper protection of the plaintiff's rights necessarily requires him to employ counsel to gain redress for the wrong, he may recover as an element of damage reasonable counsel fees."
  9. McCabe v. Goodfellow

    133 N.Y. 89 (N.Y. 1892)   Cited 63 times
    In McCabe v. Goodfellow (133 N.Y. 89, 94-95, supra) the court said: "We fail to discover anything in the organization of this association, or in its constitution, or professed objects, or in the methods which it adopted for the conduct of its affairs, which indicates an intention on the part of these members to become personally bound for any debts contracted by its officers and committees beyond what might be necessary for the maintenance of its existence.
  10. Russell Sons v. Stampers G.L.L.U. No. 22

    57 Misc. 96 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1907)   Cited 7 times
    In Russell Sons v. Stampers Gold Leaf L.U. No. 22 (57 Misc. 96) the court recognized the union as a separate entity and held that the unlawful acts of certain members did not ipso facto bind the union.