§

Perkins Machine Co.

141 N.L.R.B. 98 (N.L.R.B. 1963)
Perkins Machine Co.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.

    351 U.S. 149 (1956)   Cited 223 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith

  2. National Labor Rel. Board v. Jacobs Mfg. Co.

    196 F.2d 680 (2d Cir. 1952)   Cited 49 times
    In Labor Board v. Jacobs Mfg. Co., 196 F.2d 680, the Second Circuit upheld a Board finding of bad-faith bargaining based on an employer's refusal to supply financial information under circumstances similar to those here. Because of the conflict and the importance of the question we granted certiorari. 350 U.S. 922.

  3. Sinclair Refining Company v. N.L.R.B

    306 F.2d 569 (5th Cir. 1962)   Cited 22 times
    In Sinclair Refining Company v. N.L.R.B. (5 Cir. 1962) 306 F.2d 569, 577 enforcement of a similar Board order, directing production of data relevant to certain grievances, was refused on the ground that there must first be arbitration to pass on the employer's contention that the contract barred the filing of grievances of the nature in question.

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Gulf Atlantic Warehouse Co.

    291 F.2d 475 (5th Cir. 1961)   Cited 16 times

    No. 18701. June 12, 1961. Jules H. Gordon, Atty., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Andrew P. Carter, New Orleans, La., for respondent. Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, RIVES, Circuit Judge, and DE VANE, District Judge. TUTTLE, Chief Judge. This petition to enforce a Labor Board order deals with the right of the Union to require the employer to furnish

  5. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Nash-Finch Co.

    211 F.2d 622 (8th Cir. 1954)   Cited 20 times
    In Nash-Finch the union had specifically bargained over certain benefits under a hospital insurance plan, as well as Christmas bonuses, but in final negotiation these requests were dropped and did not appear in the collective bargaining agreement.

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. F.W. Woolworth Co.

    235 F.2d 319 (9th Cir. 1956)   Cited 14 times

    No. 14577. June 25, 1956. David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Edward D. Friedman, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Daniel J. Harrington, Atty., N.L.R.B., Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. Davies, Hardy Schenck, Christopher W. Hoey, New York City, George O. Bahrs, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. Before STEPHENS, FEE and CHAMBERS, Circuit Judges. CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge. Herein we have a question of whether the Woolworth

  7. National Labor Rel. Board v. Otis Elevator Co.

    208 F.2d 176 (2d Cir. 1953)   Cited 14 times

    No. 28, Docket 22727. Argued October 6, 1953. Decided November 10, 1953. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Asso. Gen. Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel and Mary E. Williamson, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Fayette S. Dunn, New York City, and Helen F. Humphrey, Washington, D.C. (Denham Humphrey, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent