Perfection Macaroni Co.
3 Cited authorities
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.
395 U.S. 575 (1969) Cited 1,035 times 67 Legal AnalysesHolding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
Labor Board v. Parts Co.
375 U.S. 405 (1964) Cited 213 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”
N.L.R.B. v. Stanton Enterprises, Inc.
351 F.2d 261 (4th Cir. 1965) Cited 6 timesNo. 9849. Argued June 4, 1965. Decided September 30, 1965. Wayne S. Bishop, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Gary Green, Atty., N.L.R.B., on brief), for petitioner. George V. Gardner, Washington, D.C. (Frederick F. Holroyd, Charleston, W. Va., on the brief), for respondent. Before SOBELOFF and J. SPENCER BELL, Circuit Judges, and WINTER, District Judge. SOBELOFF, Circuit Judge. Shortly after the