§
Pepsi-Cola Co.

3 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Burnup Sims

    379 U.S. 21 (1964)   Cited 106 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"

  2. United States v. Motorlease Corp.

    334 F.2d 617 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 10 times

    No. 232, Docket 28470. Argued January 28, 1964. Decided July 15, 1964. William A. Friedlander, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C. (Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Harry Baum, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., and Robert C. Zampano, U.S. Atty., District of Connecticut, New Haven, Conn., and F. Owen Eagan, Hartford, Conn., on the brief), for appellant. Norris L. O'Neill, Hartford, Conn., for appellee. Ellis Lyons, Perlman, Lyons Emmerglick, Washington, D.C., and Jess S. Raban

  3. Rubin Bros. Footwear v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    203 F.2d 486 (5th Cir. 1953)   Cited 17 times
    In Rubin Bros. Footwear v. National Labor Relations Bd., 203 F.2d 486 (C.C.A. 5th), the Court said: "If anything is settled in labor law and under the act, we think it is that membership in a union does not guarantee the member against a discharge as such. It affords protection against discharge only where it is established that the discharge is because of union activity."