People'S Transportation Service, Inc. And Minute Man Transit, Inc.

24 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.
462 U.S. 393 (1983) Cited 652 times 11 Legal Analyses
Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bell Aerospace Co.
416 U.S. 267 (1974) Cited 759 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that an agency is "not precluded from announcing new principles in an adjudicative proceeding"
United States v. Morton Salt Co.
338 U.S. 632 (1950) Cited 905 times 9 Legal Analyses
Holding that although corporations do not have a right to privacy that is coextensive with that of individuals, they "may and should" have a right against having unreasonable demands levied on them by the federal government in violation of the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment
Okla. Press Pub. Co. v. Walling
327 U.S. 186 (1946) Cited 813 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that although agency must defend purpose behind investigation, it is not required to prove cause of action at subpoena enforcement stage
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Yeshiva University
444 U.S. 672 (1980) Cited 183 times 16 Legal Analyses
Holding that all faculty members are managers for purposes of federal labor law even though they lack any legal instruments of control
N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.
662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981) Cited 357 times 46 Legal Analyses
Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
Tripoli Co., Inc. v. Wella Corp.
400 U.S. 831 (1970) Cited 137 times
Declining to review under Hobbs Act district court's exercise of jurisdiction of claim against Federal Communications Commission because plaintiff-appellant had also filed timely petitions for review with court of appeals
International Union
459 F.2d 1329 (D.C. Cir. 1972) Cited 118 times
Holding that where a “judge plays a role in suppression of the evidence, the force of [any adverse] inference is dissipated”
Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966) Cited 56 times
Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination
United States v. Sutton
426 F.2d 1202 (D.C. Cir. 1969) Cited 47 times
In United States v. Sutton, 426 F.2d 1202 (D.C. Cir. 1969), we noted that "the sufficiency of a showing of authenticity of a document sought to be introduced into evidence is a matter residing in the sound discretion of the trial judge."
Rule 901 - Authenticating or Identifying Evidence
Fed. R. Evid. 901 Cited 5,324 times 53 Legal Analyses
Holding that "[t]estimony that a matter is what it is claimed to be" is sufficient authentication

People'S Transportation Service, Inc. And Minute Man Transit, Inc.

24 Cited authorities

Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

Holding that an agency is "not precluded from announcing new principles in an adjudicative proceeding"

Holding that although corporations do not have a right to privacy that is coextensive with that of individuals, they "may and should" have a right against having unreasonable demands levied on them by the federal government in violation of the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment

Holding that although agency must defend purpose behind investigation, it is not required to prove cause of action at subpoena enforcement stage

Holding that all faculty members are managers for purposes of federal labor law even though they lack any legal instruments of control

Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

Declining to review under Hobbs Act district court's exercise of jurisdiction of claim against Federal Communications Commission because plaintiff-appellant had also filed timely petitions for review with court of appeals

Holding that where a “judge plays a role in suppression of the evidence, the force of [any adverse] inference is dissipated”

Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

In United States v. Sutton, 426 F.2d 1202 (D.C. Cir. 1969), we noted that "the sufficiency of a showing of authenticity of a document sought to be introduced into evidence is a matter residing in the sound discretion of the trial judge."

Holding that "[t]estimony that a matter is what it is claimed to be" is sufficient authentication