§

Peoples Service Drug Stores, Inc.

154 N.L.R.B. 1516 (N.L.R.B. 1965)
Peoples Service Drug Stores, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Mine Workers v. Arkansas Flooring Co.

    351 U.S. 62 (1956)   Cited 79 times
    In United Mine Workers v. Arkansas Oak Flooring Co., 351 U.S. 62, 76 S.Ct. 559, 100 L. Ed. 941, references to postlegislative history were referred to in the opinion of the Court.

  2. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Trimfit of Calif

    211 F.2d 206 (9th Cir. 1954)   Cited 29 times
    Affirming an NLRB order requiring reinstatement of pro-Union former employees

  4. United States v. Waterman Steamship Corp.

    330 F.2d 128 (5th Cir. 1964)   Cited 12 times

    No. 20040. March 30, 1964. Rehearing Denied May 4, 1964. David I. Granger, Sherman L. Cohn, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Vernol R. Jansen, U.S. Atty., Mobile, Ala., Morton Hollander, Stephen B. Swartz, I. Henry Kutz, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for appellant. John W. McConnell, Jr., William H. Armbrecht, Armbrecht, Jackson, McConnell DeMouy, Mobile, Ala., for appellee, Armbrecht, Jackson

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Overnite Transportation Company

    308 F.2d 279 (4th Cir. 1962)   Cited 13 times

    No. 8497. Argued March 22, 1962. Decided September 4, 1962. Robert Sewell, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Melvin Pollack, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, on the brief), for petitioner. Ernest W. Machen, Jr., Charlotte, N.C. (J.W. Alexander, Jr., and Blakeney, Alexander Machen, Charlotte, N.C., on the brief), for respondent. Before SOBELOFF, Chief Judge, and