§

Pennsylvania State Police

No. 76087228 (T.T.A.B. Mar. 18, 2004)
Pennsylvania State Police

5 Cited authorities

  1. INSTITUT NAT. DES APPELLATIONS v. VINTNERS

    958 F.2d 1574 (Fed. Cir. 1992)   Cited 13 times
    Affirming finding, on summary judgment, that the term "Chablis" is generic

  2. In re Chemical Dynamics, Inc.

    839 F.2d 1569 (Fed. Cir. 1988)   Cited 14 times
    Concluding that generalized sales and advertising figures do not establish secondary meaning where the alleged mark is not promoted by itself but instead as part of a larger mark or with other designs or marks

  3. Application of Schenectady Varnish Company

    280 F.2d 169 (C.C.P.A. 1960)   Cited 5 times

    Patent Appeal No. 6581. July 6, 1960 Cushman, Darby Cushman, Washington, D.C. (Richard G. Kline, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for appellant. Clarence W. Moore, Washington, D.C., for the Commissioner of Patents. Before WORLEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, MARTIN, and SMITH, Judges, and Judge WILLIAM H. KIRKPATRICK. United States Senior Judge for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, designated to participate in place of Judge O'Connell, pursuant to provisions of Section 294(d), Title 28 United States

  4. Application of Servel Inc.

    181 F.2d 192 (C.C.P.A. 1950)   Cited 5 times

    Patent Appeals No. 5658. April 3, 1950. J.L. Kelly, Washington, D.C. (A. Yates Dowell, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for appellant. E.L. Reynolds, Washington, D.C. (Walter J. Derenberg, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for Commissioner of Patents. Before GARRETT, Chief Judge, and JACKSON, O'CONNELL, and JOHNSON, Judges. O'CONNELL, Judge. This is an appeal from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents in which the decision of the Examiner of Trade-Marks refusing appellant's application to register

  5. Section 2.51 - Drawing required

    37 C.F.R. § 2.51   Cited 13 times
    Allowing a typed drawing for marks consisting of words that are not depicted in special form