§

Pennant Foods Co.

352 N.L.R.B. 451 (N.L.R.B. 2008)
Pennant Foods Co.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. Federated Logistics Operations v. N.L.R.B

    400 F.3d 920 (D.C. Cir. 2005)   Cited 16 times

    Nos. 03-1323, 03-1357. Argued September 14, 2004. Decided February 25, 2005. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Meir Feder argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Andrew M. Kramer and Julia M. Broas. Robert J. Englehart, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Arthur F. Rosenfeld, General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel

  5. Carpenters v. N.L.R.B

    481 F.3d 804 (D.C. Cir. 2007)   Cited 9 times

    Nos. 05-1416, 06-1098. Argued October 19, 2006. Decided March 16, 2007. On Petitions for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Osnat K. Rind argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner. Ruth E. Burdick, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Ronald E. Meisburg, General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, and Julie B. Broido, Senior Attorney

  6. Flamingo Hilton-Laughlin v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    148 F.3d 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1998)   Cited 15 times
    Concluding that statements such as "loss to employees was an inevitable consequence of their unionizing" are "partisan, but largely permissible"