Penn Central Containers, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.

    312 U.S. 426 (1941)   Cited 506 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"
  2. Mine Workers v. Arkansas Flooring Co.

    351 U.S. 62 (1956)   Cited 79 times
    In United Mine Workers v. Arkansas Oak Flooring Co., 351 U.S. 62, 76 S.Ct. 559, 100 L. Ed. 941, references to postlegislative history were referred to in the opinion of the Court.
  3. Am. Crystal Sugar Co. v. Mandeville Island Farms

    343 U.S. 957 (1952)   Cited 62 times
    Holding a limited publication "communicates the contents of a [work] to a definitely selected group and for a limited purpose,. . . ."
  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Huntsville Mfg. Co.

    203 F.2d 430 (5th Cir. 1953)   Cited 22 times
    In NLRB v. Huntsville Mfg. Co., 203 F.2d 430 (5th Cir. 1953), this court articulated a standard of "reasonableness which courts may exact of the board in the exercise of the discretion accorded it in determining `whether or not the election should be set aside for irregularities in procedure.'"
  5. N.L.R.B. v. Deutsch Company

    265 F.2d 473 (9th Cir. 1959)   Cited 10 times

    No. 15889. April 8, 1959. Jerome D. Fenton, General Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Fannie M. Boyls, Irving M. Herman, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for N.L.R.B. Coyle Cooper, Leon M. Cooper, Los Angeles, Cal., for Deutsch Co. Before FEE, CHAMBERS and BARNES, Circuit Judges. BARNES, Circuit Judge. This is a petition for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board issued against the respondent company

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. General Armature & Mfg. Co.

    192 F.2d 316 (3d Cir. 1951)   Cited 14 times

    No. 10472. Argued October 4, 1951. Filed November 7, 1951. Dominick L. Manoli, Washington, D.C., (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant Gen. Counsel, and Thomas F. Maher, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Marvin C. Wahl, Baltimore, Md. (Blanche Genauer Wahl, Baltimore, Md., on the brief), for respondent. Before McLAUGHLIN, STALEY, and HASTIE, Circuit Judges. HASTIE, Circuit Judge. Two principal contentions are advanced