§

Peninsular & Occidental Steamship Co.

132 N.L.R.B. 10 (N.L.R.B. 1961)
Peninsular & Occidental Steamship Co.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Benz v. Compania Naviera Hidalgo

    353 U.S. 138 (1957)   Cited 143 times
    Holding the LMRA inapplicable to the picketing of a foreign ship operated entirely by foreign seamen

  2. Bartholomew v. Universe Tankships, Inc.

    263 F.2d 437 (2d Cir. 1959)   Cited 120 times
    Holding that Jones Act applied to United States resident who was fatally injured aboard a Liberian vessel within United States waters

  3. Bobolakis v. Compania Panamena Maritima San Gerassimo

    168 F. Supp. 236 (S.D.N.Y. 1958)   Cited 41 times
    Holding majority ownership and control a sufficient basis for applying the Jones Act, but citing a split in authority in the Southern District of New York

  4. Zielinski v. Empresa Hondurena de Vapores

    113 F. Supp. 93 (S.D.N.Y. 1953)   Cited 24 times

    June 2, 1953. Archibald F. McGrath, New York City, for plaintiff. Burlingham, Hupper Kennedy, New York City (Eugene Underwood, New York City, of counsel), for defendant Empresa Hondurena de Vapores. DIMOCK, District Judge. Defendant Empresa Hondurena de Vapores, a Honduran corporation, which I shall call "Empresa", moves to dismiss the complaint as against it on the ground that the court has no jurisdiction of the action. The action is brought by the third mate of the Orotava, a vessel operated by

  5. Gerradin v. United Fruit Co.

    60 F.2d 927 (2d Cir. 1932)   Cited 36 times
    In Gerradin v. United Fruit Co., 60 F.2d 927 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 287 U.S. 642, 53 S.Ct. 92, 77 L.Ed. 556 (1932), this court read the Jones Act in pari materia with 46 U.S.C. § 713 which provides that any person "who shall be employed or engaged to serve in any capacity on board [any vessel belonging to a United States citizen] shall be deemed and taken to be a `seaman'..."

  6. Air Line Stew. Stew. Ass'n, v. North. Air.

    162 F. Supp. 684 (D. Minn. 1958)   Cited 5 times

    Civ. No. 3-57-110. June 10, 1958. Lee Loevinger, Minneapolis, Minn., Lee Leibik and Ruth Weyand, Chicago, Ill., by Lee Leibik, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. Dorsey, Owen, Barker, Scott Barber, Minneapolis, Minn., by Henry Halladay, Minneapolis, Minn., for respondent. DONOVAN, District Judge. This case is before the court on petitioner's motion for summary judgment. The motion is based upon the pleadings, exhibits and affidavits filed with the court. The parties will be referred to as petitioner