Penfield Plumbing and Heating, Inc.

14 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wyman-Gordon Co.
394 U.S. 759 (1969) Cited 809 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding invalid a legislative rule developed in agency adjudication
Pittsburgh Glass Co. v. Board
313 U.S. 146 (1941) Cited 294 times
In Pittsburgh Glass, the Court held that it was not a denial of due process for the Board to refuse to consider evidence relating to the certification issue when petitioner first sought to introduce such evidence at the unfair labor practice hearing.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Golden Age Beverage Co.
415 F.2d 26 (5th Cir. 1969) Cited 95 times
In NLRB v. Golden Age Beverage Company, 415 F.2d 26, 30 (5th Cir. 1969), this court apparently considered hearsay evidence at this stage of proceedings to set aside an election.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bata Shoe Co.
377 F.2d 821 (4th Cir. 1967) Cited 65 times
In NLRB v. Bata Shoe Co., 377 F.2d 821 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 917, 88 S.Ct. 238, 19 L.Ed.2d 265 (1967), upon which Randall relies, the employer presented specific evidence of more severe procedural irregularities that demonstrably affected the election results.
N.L.R.B. v. Air Ctrl. Prod. of St. Petersburg
335 F.2d 245 (5th Cir. 1964) Cited 54 times
No. 21017. July 28, 1964. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Lawrence Gold, Atty., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Stephen B. Goldberg, Paula Omansky, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Harrison C. Thompson, Jr., Shackleford, Farrior, Stallings, Glos Evans, Tampa, Fla., for respondent. Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, BROWN, Circuit Judge, and BREWSTER, District Judge. JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge. This is another § 8(a)(5), 29
N.L.R.B. v. O.K. Van Storage, Inc.
297 F.2d 74 (5th Cir. 1961) Cited 50 times
In NLRB v. O.K. Van Storage, Inc., (5 Cir. 1961) 297 F.2d 74, 76, the necessity for granting a hearing on objections to an election was under consideration.
Macomb Pottery Company v. N.L.R.B
376 F.2d 450 (7th Cir. 1967) Cited 26 times
No. 15675. April 18, 1967. Richard L. Marcus, R. Theodore Clark, Jr., Chicago, Ill., Seyfarth, Shaw, Fairweather Geraldson, Chicago, Ill., of counsel, for petitioners. Joseph E. Finley, Melvin S. Schwarzwald, Cleveland, Ohio, Metzenbaum, Gaines, Schwartz, Krupansky, Finley Stern, Cleveland, Ohio, of counsel, for intervenor. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Malcolm David Schultz, Atty., N.L.R.B., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, George B. Driesen,
Intertype Company v. N.L.R.B
401 F.2d 41 (4th Cir. 1968) Cited 23 times
No. 11561. Argued April 2, 1968. Decided August 23, 1968. Certiorari Denied January 20, 1969. See 89 S.Ct. 686. Kenneth C. McGuiness, Washington, D.C. (Vedder, Price, Kaufman, Kammholz McGuiness, Washington, D.C., and Flournoy L. Largent, Jr., Winchester, Va., on brief), for petitioner. Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and William J. Avrutis, Atty., N.L.R.B., on brief), for respondent
Follett Corporation v. N.L.R.B
397 F.2d 91 (7th Cir. 1968) Cited 20 times
No. 16221. June 10, 1968. Robert C. Claus, James S. Petrie, John P. Jacoby, Chicago, Ill., Vedder, Price, Kaufman Kammholz, Chicago, Ill., of counsel, for petitioners. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, George B. Driesen, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Fred R. Kimmel, Atty., N.L.R.B., for respondent. Before CASTLE, Chief Judge, and SWYGERT and CUMMINGS, Circuit Judges. SWYGERT, Circuit Judge. Follett Corporation
N.L.R.B. v. Krieger-Ragsdale Company
379 F.2d 517 (7th Cir. 1967) Cited 16 times
No. 15926. May 25, 1967. Rehearing Denied August 8, 1967. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Peter M. Giesey, Atty., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, George B. Driesen, Peter M. Giesey, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Richard F. Watt, Eugene Cotton, Drew S. Days III, Cotton, Watt, Jones King, Chicago, Ill., for intervenor. Arthur R. Donovan, Joseph A. Yocum, Evansville, Ind., Martin J. Burns, Chicago, Ill., Harry P. Dees, Joseph
Section 159 - Representatives and elections
29 U.S.C. § 159 Cited 2,441 times 12 Legal Analyses
Granting a bargaining unit the exclusive right to represent employees in it

Penfield Plumbing and Heating, Inc.

14 Cited authorities

Holding invalid a legislative rule developed in agency adjudication

In Pittsburgh Glass, the Court held that it was not a denial of due process for the Board to refuse to consider evidence relating to the certification issue when petitioner first sought to introduce such evidence at the unfair labor practice hearing.

In NLRB v. Golden Age Beverage Company, 415 F.2d 26, 30 (5th Cir. 1969), this court apparently considered hearsay evidence at this stage of proceedings to set aside an election.

In NLRB v. Bata Shoe Co., 377 F.2d 821 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 917, 88 S.Ct. 238, 19 L.Ed.2d 265 (1967), upon which Randall relies, the employer presented specific evidence of more severe procedural irregularities that demonstrably affected the election results.

In NLRB v. O.K. Van Storage, Inc., (5 Cir. 1961) 297 F.2d 74, 76, the necessity for granting a hearing on objections to an election was under consideration.

Granting a bargaining unit the exclusive right to represent employees in it