§

Pembrook Management, Inc.

296 N.L.R.B. 1226 (N.L.R.B. 1989)
Pembrook Management, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Mead Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    697 F.2d 1013 (11th Cir. 1983)   Cited 25 times
    Holding that withdrawal with out good cause of a tentatively agreed upon proposal was evidence of bad faith

  3. Elec. Products Div. of Midland-Ross v. N.L.R.B

    617 F.2d 977 (3d Cir. 1980)   Cited 27 times
    In Electrical Products Division of Midland-Ross Corp. v. NLRB, 617 F.2d 977, 987 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 871, 101 S.Ct. 210, 66 L.Ed.2d 91 (1980), we referred to three elements as usually found in these cases where we enforced a Gissel II order: effect of the unfair labor practices on a significant portion of the bargaining unit, the participation of senior company officials, and the continuing impact of the same factors that undermined the first election.

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Styletek, Div. of Pandel-Bradford

    520 F.2d 275 (1st Cir. 1975)   Cited 29 times

    No. 75-1017. Argued June 3, 1975. Decided August 6, 1975. Margery E. Lieber, Atty., with whom Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, and John H. Ferguson, Atty., were on brief, for petitioner. George H. Foley, Boston, Mass., with whom Hale Dorr, Boston, Mass., was on brief, for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before COFFIN, Chief Judge, McENTEE

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Colonial Haven Nursing Home, Inc.

    542 F.2d 691 (7th Cir. 1976)   Cited 26 times
    Holding that "anticipatory photographing. . . . does not violate § 8 of the Act where the photographs are taken to establish for purposes of an injunction suit that pickets engaged in violence"

  6. DeQueen General Hosp. v. N.L.R.B

    744 F.2d 612 (8th Cir. 1984)   Cited 10 times
    In DeQueen General Hospital v. NLRB, 744 F.2d 612, 614 (8th Cir. 1984), we reiterated that, "[i]n evaluating employer conduct * * * the test is not whether an attempt at [interference] has succeeded or failed, but whether `the employer engaged in conduct which reasonably tends to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees in the free exercise of their rights under section 7.'" (Citations omitted.)

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Sacramento Clinical Laboratory

    623 F.2d 110 (9th Cir. 1980)   Cited 9 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 79-7481. Argued and Submitted July 8, 1980. Decided July 11, 1980. Frederick Havard, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Kathleen M. Kelly, argued and J. Richard Thesing, on brief, Little, Mendelson, Fastiff Tichy, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. Application for Enforcement of an Order of The National Labor Relations Board. Before WRIGHT, KENNEDY and HUG, Circuit Judges. EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge: We are asked to enforce three orders of the Board finding Sacramento Clinical Laboratory

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Rexall Corp.

    725 F.2d 74 (8th Cir. 1984)   Cited 2 times

    No. 83-1320. Submitted December 12, 1983. Decided January 10, 1984. William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Andrew F. Tranovich, Sue Gunter, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for N.L.R.B. D. Michael Linihan, James N. Foster, Jr., Ralph E. Kennedy, St. Louis, Mo., for respondent; McMahon, Berger, Breckenridge, Hanna, Linihan Cody, St. Louis, Mo., of counsel. Before LAY, Chief