ยง
Peck, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Hudgens v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    424 U.S. 507 (1976)   Cited 543 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding picketers "did not have a First Amendment right to enter [a privately owned] shopping center for the purpose of advertising their strike"

  2. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 495 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

  3. Labor Board v. Fansteel Corp.

    306 U.S. 240 (1939)   Cited 281 times
    In Fansteel, the Board awarded reinstatement with backpay to employees who engaged in a "sit down strike" that led to confrontation with local law enforcement officials.

  4. Cone Mills Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    413 F.2d 445 (4th Cir. 1969)   Cited 21 times
    Relying on "the fact that the same request [for information regarding a proposed pension plan] was repeated from time to time . . . within the period of six months prior to the charging date"

  5. Advance Industries Division-Overhead Door Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    540 F.2d 878 (7th Cir. 1976)   Cited 9 times

    No. 75-1914. Argued June 1, 1976. Decided September 1, 1976. Timothy K. Carroll, Detroit, Mich., for petitioner. Elliott Moore, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Eric Moskowitz, Michael S. Winer, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before PELL, SPRECHER and BAUER, Circuit Judges. PELL, Circuit Judge. The issues presented in this case by the petition of Advance Industries Division-Overhead Door Corporation (Company) for review

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. of Miami

    449 F.2d 824 (5th Cir. 1971)   Cited 13 times
    In NLRB v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co., 449 F.2d 824 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 407 U.S. 910, 92 S.Ct. 2434, 32 L.Ed.2d 683 (1972), the court found that the employer violated the Act by discharging employees who ceased working, went to the plant manager to protest the discharge of six other employees, and upon the plant manager's refusal to reinstate the six, sat down and refused either to return to work or to leave the plant.

  7. Golay Co. v. N.L.R.B

    371 F.2d 259 (7th Cir. 1967)   Cited 9 times
    In Nos. 15540 and 15656, Golay Co. v. NLRB, 371 F.2d 259 (7th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 944, 87 S.Ct. 2079, 18 L.Ed.2d 1332, we enforced the Board's order with respect to Section 8(a)(3) and (1) violations of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. ยง 151, et seq., by respondent (Company) covering 19 of 42 employees.