§

P.B. & S. Chemical Co.

148 N.L.R.B. 152 (N.L.R.B. 1964)
P.B. & S. Chemical Co.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Taitel

    261 F.2d 1 (7th Cir. 1958)   Cited 16 times

    No. 12335. October 30, 1958. Rehearing Denied December 22, 1958. Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Sheldon M. Charone, Atty., Chicago, Ill., Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Fannie M. Boyls, Robert J. Wilson, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. George Rose, Indianapolis, Ind., for respondent. Before DUFFY, Chief Judge, HASTINGS, Circuit Judge, and WHAM, District Judge. HASTINGS, Circuit Judge. This case comes before

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Larry Faul Oldsmobile Co.

    316 F.2d 595 (7th Cir. 1963)   Cited 11 times
    In Faul, a manager's statement that "he might as well as throw the place up for grabs" was made in response to a direct question as to the future of the company by an employee who had already been discharged. Under those circumstances, the court determined that the statement could not in any sense be interpreted as a threat against unionization to current employees.

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Howe Scale Company

    311 F.2d 502 (7th Cir. 1963)   Cited 11 times

    No. 13825. January 2, 1963. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Melvin J. Welles, Janet Kohn, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, for petitioner. Mervin N. Bachman, Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Before CASTLE and SWYGERT, Circuit Judges, and GRUBB, District Judge. GRUBB, District Judge. This case is before the court on petition for enforcement of the order of the National Labor Relations Board against respondent. The

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Crean

    326 F.2d 391 (7th Cir. 1964)   Cited 8 times

    No. 14181. January 3, 1964. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Alfred Brummel, Atty., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Melvin J. Welles, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Walter S. Davis, Milwaukee, Wis., Robertson, Hoebreckx Davis, John G. Vergeront, Milwaukee, Wis., for respondents. Before DUFFY, SCHNACKENBERG, and KNOCH, Circuit Judges. KNOCH, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board has petitioned this Court pursuant to

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Piezo Manufacturing Corporation

    290 F.2d 455 (2d Cir. 1961)   Cited 6 times

    No. 325, Docket 26757. Argued April 11, 1961. Decided May 8, 1961. Jules Gordon, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer and Vincent W. Bradley, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. William Chester Taplitz, New York City, for respondent. Before CLARK, MEDINA and FRIENDLY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.