§

Payless Drug Stores

311 N.L.R.B. 678 (N.L.R.B. 1993)
Payless Drug Stores

6 Cited authorities

  1. Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins

    447 U.S. 74 (1980)   Cited 737 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "views expressed by members of the public" in a privately owned shopping mall "will not likely be identified with those of the owner"

  2. Lechmere, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    502 U.S. 527 (1992)   Cited 156 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Board erred in finding that employer should have allowed union on its premises because it had no other way to reach its target audience, inasmuch as in reaching its decision the Board misconstrued prior Supreme Court precedent

  3. Robins v. Pruneyard Shopping Center

    23 Cal.3d 899 (Cal. 1979)   Cited 228 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that California's constitution protected free speech and petitioning, reasonably exercised, in privately owned shopping centers

  4. In re Lane

    71 Cal.2d 872 (Cal. 1969)   Cited 50 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Emphasizing the public nature of the sidewalk and store

  5. Lechmere, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    914 F.2d 313 (1st Cir. 1990)   Cited 15 times

    No. 89-1683. Heard January 10, 1990. Decided September 17, 1990. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied October 25, 1990. Robert P. Joy, with whom Keith H. McCown and Morgan, Brown Joy, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for petitioner. Richard A. Cohen, Atty., with whom Robert E. Allen, Associate Gen. Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, and Howard E. Perlstein, Supervisory Atty., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for respondent. Petition for review of an order of the National

  6. Northern California Newspaper Organizing Com. v. Solano Associates

    193 Cal.App.3d 1644 (Cal. Ct. App. 1987)   Cited 4 times

    Docket No. A032887. August 12, 1987. Appeal from Superior Court of Solano County, No. 90767, Dwight C. Ely, Judge. COUNSEL John D. O'Connor, Thomas C. Burch and Tarkington, O'Connor O'Neill for Defendants and Appellants. Margaret C. Crosby, Alan L. Schlosser and Edward M. Chen for Plaintiffs and Respondents. OPINION SCOTT, J. We hold that a state court has jurisdiction to adjudicate whether a labor union has the right under the California Constitution to distribute literature concerning a labor dispute