§
Patrick & Co.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 712 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  2. American Federation of Television & Radio Artists v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    395 F.2d 622 (D.C. Cir. 1968)   Cited 103 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Applying Taft

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Patent Trader, Inc.

    415 F.2d 190 (2d Cir. 1969)   Cited 22 times

    No. 432, Docket 32743. Argued March 13, 1969. Decided July 29, 1969. Nancy M. Sherman, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Baruch A. Fellner, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Hugh P. Husband, Jr., New York City, for respondent. Before MOORE and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges and McLEAN, District Judge. Of the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation. MOORE, Circuit Judge:

  4. Korn Industries, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    389 F.2d 117 (4th Cir. 1967)   Cited 13 times
    Holding that an employer need not produce information that is not available to it for the purpose of supplying the union with information requested

  5. Trans-Western Exp. v. Local Union 17

    603 P.2d 959 (Colo. App. 1979)   Cited 2 times

    No. 78-401 Decided August 23, 1979. Rehearing denied September 20, 1979. Certiorari denied December 17, 1979. Labor union local appealed from a trial court order denying its petition to modify a permanent injunction prohibiting it from picketing plaintiff. Affirmed 1. INJUNCTION — Permanent — Modification — Discretionary With Trial Court. Once a permanent injunction has been entered, the decision as to whether that injunction should be modified is discretionary with the trial court. 2. Permanent

  6. Federal-Mogul Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    524 F.2d 37 (6th Cir. 1975)   Cited 3 times

    No. 74-2178. October 13, 1975. John Corbett O'Meara, Lawrence G. Campbell, Dickinson, Wright, McKean Cudlip, Earl V. Brown, Jr., Detroit, Mich., for petitioner. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Paul J. Spielberg, Edmund D. Cooke, Jr., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before EDWARDS, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges. ORDER Petitioner seeks review (and the Board by cross-application seeks enforcement) of an order of

  7. N.L.R.B. v. L. 964, United Bro., Carpenters

    447 F.2d 643 (2d Cir. 1971)   Cited 6 times

    No. 808, Docket 35598. Argued May 12, 1971. Decided August 30, 1971. Leonard Wagman, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frank H. Itkin, William J. Avrutis, Attys., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for petitioner. William M. Mulderig, New City, N.Y. (Mulderig O'Connor, New City, N.Y., on the brief), for respondent. Before FRIENDLY, Chief Judge, WATERMAN, and HAYS, Circuit Judges. HAYS, Circuit Judge: For fifteen

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Commerce Co.

    328 F.2d 600 (5th Cir. 1964)   Cited 12 times

    No. 20477. March 3, 1964. Rehearing Denied March 30, 1964. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Solomon I. Hirsh, Paula Omansky, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Charles R. Vickery, Jr., Liddell, Austin, Dawson Sapp, Houston, Tex., Harley W. McConnell, Houston, Tex., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON and GRIFFIN B. BELL, Circuit Judges, and BREWSTER, District Judge. HUTCHESON, Circuit

  9. N.L.R.B. v. SHARON HATS, INCORPORATED

    289 F.2d 628 (5th Cir. 1961)   Cited 5 times

    No. 18517. May 5, 1961. Rehearing Denied June 6, 1961. Solomon I. Hirsh, Atty., N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Emil Corenbleth, Dallas, for respondent. Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and HUTCHESON and JONES, Circuit Judges. TUTTLE, Chief Judge. The National Labor Relations Board, following proceedings under Section 10(c) of the National Labor Relations Act, found the respondent to be