§

Pasadena Bowling Center

150 N.L.R.B. 729 (N.L.R.B. 1964)
Pasadena Bowling Center

6 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Colten

    105 F.2d 179 (6th Cir. 1939)   Cited 62 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Colten, 6 Cir., 105 F.2d 179, 183, it was said that "* * * the strife which is sought to be averted is no less an object of legislative solicitude when contract, death, or operation of law brings about change of ownership in the employing agency."

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wallick

    198 F.2d 477 (3d Cir. 1952)   Cited 27 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Wallick, 198 F.2d 477 (3 Cir. 1952), that court sustained a Board order requiring a respondent partnership which operated several enterprises engaged in the manufacture of ladies' garments to either reopen a plant which it had closed in violation of the Act because its employees had organized or give its employees an opportunity to work in other plants operated by the partnership.

  3. Panno v. Russo

    82 Cal.App.2d 408 (Cal. Ct. App. 1947)   Cited 31 times
    Holding that waiver "may result from an express agreement or be inferred from circumstances indicating an intent to waive"

  4. Reynolds Pallet Box Co. v. N.L.R.B

    324 F.2d 833 (6th Cir. 1963)   Cited 7 times
    In Reynolds Pallet Box Co. v. NLRB, 324 F.2d 833 (6th Cir. 1963), the employer engaged in coercive conduct during a campaign to organize the employees and discriminatorily discharged employees because of their union activity.

  5. Trabin v. Title Ins. & Trust Co.

    52 Cal.2d 149 (Cal. 1959)   Cited 8 times

    Docket No. L.A. 25309. May 19, 1959. APPEALS from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Roger Alton Pfaff, Judge. Affirmed. Clement H. Jacomini, Lever Anker and Sidney Dorfman for Appellants. Samuel Duskin and David S. Smith for Respondent. GIBSON, C.J. Plaintiff brought this action against Mr. and Mrs. Milton Kauffman, alleging that he had supplied household furnishings to them at an agreed price of $18,245.42 and that only $2,332.30 had been paid, leaving a balance of $15,913

  6. West Texas Utilities v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    195 F.2d 519 (5th Cir. 1952)   Cited 3 times

    No. 13805. April 4, 1952. Rehearing Denied May 1, 1952. Frank Cain, Dallas, Tex., for petitioner. Thomas F. Maher, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, all of Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before HOLMES, RUSSELL, and RIVES, Circuit Judges. HOLMES, Circuit Judge. On June 28, 1951, pursuant to Section 10(c) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq., the National Labor Relations