§

Partee Flooring Mill

107 N.L.R.B. 1177 (N.L.R.B. 1954)
Partee Flooring Mill

7 Cited authorities

  1. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Reed Prince MFG

    205 F.2d 131 (1st Cir. 1953)   Cited 118 times
    In Reed Prince, supra, this court affirmed the Board's finding of refusal to bargain in good faith only "[a]fter an attentive review of the entire record of the bargaining negotiations."

  3. W.W. Cross Co. v. National Labor Rel. Board

    174 F.2d 875 (1st Cir. 1949)   Cited 52 times
    Holding that " 'wages' " in the NLRA "embraces within its meaning direct and immediate economic benefits flowing from the employment relationship covers a group insurance program"

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Natl. Shoes

    208 F.2d 688 (2d Cir. 1953)   Cited 29 times
    Deciding that the employerengaged in an unfair labor practice in violation of § 8 where the record contained evidence of “[l]ong delays unaccounted for in the matter of correspondence and the preparation of documents, the postponement of meetings of the negotiators for weeks at a time, and the reopening of questions previously settled”

  5. National Labor Rel. Board v. Landis Tool Co.

    193 F.2d 279 (3d Cir. 1952)   Cited 16 times
    In Landis Tool Co. the company allowed an increase of 7 cents an hour to 15 pattern makers with whose union it was currently bargaining at the same time that the wage increase was allowed to some 900 other employees in the plant.

  6. National Labor Bd. v. Dealers, Rebuilders

    199 F.2d 249 (8th Cir. 1952)   Cited 4 times

    No. 14567. October 23, 1952. Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Fanny M. Boyls, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., were with her on the brief), for petitioner. Wayne Owen, Talley Owen, Lawrence B. Burrow, Jr., Lawrence B. Burrow, Sr., and Moore, Burrow, Chowning Mitchell, Little Rock, Ark., submitted brief for respondent.

  7. Associated Unions v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    200 F.2d 52 (7th Cir. 1952)

    No. 10635. November 28, 1952. Max Raskin, Milwaukee, Wis., for petitioner. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Nancy M. Sherman, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before KERNER, FINNEGAN, and SWAIM, Circuit Judges. KERNER, Circuit Judge. Petitioner, herein called the Union, has petitioned to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board, dismissing