§

Parkway Florist, Inc.

06-CA-209583 (N.L.R.B. Dec. 12, 2018)
Parkway Florist, Inc.

16 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 657 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Aikens v. Deluxe Financial Services, Inc.

    217 F.R.D. 533 (D. Kan. 2003)   Cited 155 times
    Holding that a party seeking a stay based on undue burden or expense must explain the burden in detail

  4. Labor Board v. Burnup Sims

    379 U.S. 21 (1964)   Cited 106 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Scrivener

    405 U.S. 117 (1972)   Cited 83 times
    Holding that protection from retaliation for "fil[ing] charges or giv[ing] testimony" under the National Labor Relations Act extends to an employee who gave a written sworn statement to an NLRB examiner

  6. Multi-Ad Services, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    255 F.3d 363 (7th Cir. 2001)   Cited 33 times
    Affirming Board's finding of coercive interrogation where an employee was asked "why he would want to bring a union into the company"

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Joy Recovery Tech

    134 F.3d 1307 (7th Cir. 1998)   Cited 28 times
    Concluding that "[i]n this case, timing is everything," where "[t]he closing of the department comes on the heels of the union's organizational activity," including filing a petition for a representation election

  8. Champion Pro Consulting Grp., Inc. v. Impact Sports Football, LLC

    1:12CV27 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 26, 2014)   Cited 4 times
    Analyzing burden and overbreadth issues regarding "relating to" language in subpoena request

  9. Lou's Transp., Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    644 F. App'x 690 (6th Cir. 2016)   Cited 1 times

    No. 15-1040 No. 15-1193 04-06-2016 LOU'S TRANSPORT, INC., et al., Petitioners-Cross-Respondents, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner. DAMON J. KEITH, Circuit Judge. NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 16a0193n.06 ON PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AN ORDER FROM THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD BEFORE: KEITH, COOK, and McKEAGUE, Circuit Judges. DAMON J. KEITH, Circuit Judge. Lou's Transport Inc. ("Lou's") and T.K.M.S., Inc. ("TKMS") (collectively, "Petitioners")

  10. Perez v. El Tequila LLC

    Case No. 12-CV-588-JED-PJC (N.D. Okla. Oct. 20, 2014)   Cited 1 times

    Case No. 12-CV-588-JED-PJC 10-20-2014 THOMAS E. PEREZ, Secretary of Labor, Plaintiff, v. EL TEQUILA LLC, and CARLOS AGUIRRE, Defendants. Paul J. Cleary United States Magistrate Judge OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court are the Defendants' Motion to Compel Discovery [Dkt. No. 62], and Defendants' Second Motion to Compel [Dkt. No. 74]. Problems with discovery have required several Court interventions, see Dkt. Nos. 69, 79, 81, 82, 98; nevertheless, the Court has been advised that after additional briefing