§

Parker Brothers and Co., Inc.

101 N.L.R.B. 872 (N.L.R.B. 1952)
Parker Brothers and Co., Inc.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Edison Co. v. Labor Board

    305 U.S. 197 (1938)   Cited 19,296 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a Board order cannot be grounded in hearsay

  2. Nat. Licorice Co. v. Labor Bd.

    309 U.S. 350 (1940)   Cited 315 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that requiring employees to sign individual contracts waiving their rights to self-organization and collective bargaining violates § 8 of the NLRA

  3. Pittsburgh Glass Co. v. Board

    313 U.S. 146 (1941)   Cited 294 times
    In Pittsburgh Glass, the Court held that it was not a denial of due process for the Board to refuse to consider evidence relating to the certification issue when petitioner first sought to introduce such evidence at the unfair labor practice hearing.

  4. Labor Bd. v. Greyhound Lines

    303 U.S. 261 (1938)   Cited 264 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc., 303 U.S. 261, 58 S.Ct. 571, 572, 82 L.Ed. 831, 115 A.L.R. 307, three related corporations were involved. The two respondents claimed that the third corporation was the `employer'.

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Spiewak

    179 F.2d 695 (3d Cir. 1950)   Cited 14 times

    No. 9875. Argued March 24, 1949. Reargued May 16, 1949 and December 1, 1949. Decided February 2, 1950. Rehearing Denied March 11, 1950. Arnold Ordman, Washington, D.C. (David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Gerald H. Chambers, New York City (Chambers Chambers, New York City, on the brief), for respondents. Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and MARIS, GOODRICH, McLAUGHLIN, O'CONNELL, KALODNER

  6. National Lbr. Rel. Bd. v. Sterling Elec. M

    109 F.2d 194 (9th Cir. 1940)   Cited 15 times

    No. 9209. January 9, 1940. Upon Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Proceeding by the National Labor Relations Board against the Sterling Electric Motors, Inc., for an enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board disestablishing a so-called "inside union" of a majority of the respondent's employees. Order set aside. Charles Fahy, Gen. Counsel, Robert B. Watts, Associate Gen. Counsel, Laurence A. Knapp, and Russell Packard, all of Washington

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Indian Mich. Elec

    124 F.2d 50 (6th Cir. 1941)   Cited 6 times

    No. 8844. December 12, 1941. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of an order of the Board against the Indiana Michigan Electric Company, respondent, wherein the Michiana Electric Utility Workers Association filed a motion to intervene and respondent made a motion for an order remanding the cause to the board. Cause remanded to the National Labor Relations Board with directions. H.M. Kollender

  8. National Lbr. Rel. Bd. v. Sterling Elec. Motors

    112 F.2d 63 (9th Cir. 1940)   Cited 7 times

    No. 9209. May 7, 1940. Petition for Enforcement of Order of National Labor Relations Board. On rehearing. Judgment denying disestablishment, etc., of union and continuing hearing relative to orders affecting only respondent. For former opinion, see 109 F.2d 194. Charles Fahy, Gen. Counsel, Robert B. Watts, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Laurence A. Knapp, Asst. Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Hardy Horwin, Leonard Horwin, and Jack W. Hardy, all

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Dadourian E. Corp.

    138 F.2d 891 (2d Cir. 1943)   Cited 4 times

    No. 24. November 3, 1943. Petition by National Labor Relations Board for an order enforcing a cease and desist order of the Board which directed the Dadourian Export Corporation to bargain collectively with a local of the Congress of Industrial Organizations. Petition denied, and Board's order to cease and desist set aside in full. Roy Compton, of Chicago, Ill., and Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Associate Gen. Counsel, Howard Lichtenstein, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and David Findling

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Sterling Elec. Motors

    114 F.2d 738 (9th Cir. 1940)   Cited 5 times

    No. 9209. September 13, 1940. Appeal Dismissed October 28, 1940. See 61 S.Ct. 69, 85 L.Ed. ___. Proceeding by the National Labor Relations Board against the Sterling Electric Motors, Incorporated, for enforcement of an order of the Board disestablishing a so-called "inside union" of a majority of the respondent's employees. The order was set aside. 109 F.2d 194. Subsequently, on May 6, 1940, judgment was entered denying enforcement of an order that the employer should not bargain collectively with