Park Furniture Manufacturing Co.

8 Cited authorities

Cohen v. California
403 U.S. 15 (1971) Cited 1,271 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding "absent a . . . particularized and compelling reason for its actions, the State may not, consistently with the First and Fourteenth Amendments, make the simple public display . . . of single four-letter expletive [on a shirt] a criminal offense"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.
395 U.S. 575 (1969) Cited 1,035 times 67 Legal Analyses
Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board
379 U.S. 203 (1964) Cited 731 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA
Labor Board v. Parts Co.
375 U.S. 405 (1964) Cited 213 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”
Garment Workers v. Labor Board
366 U.S. 731 (1961) Cited 213 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that a union cannot represent a group of employees for which it does not enjoy majority support
Bourne v. N.L.R.B
332 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1964) Cited 93 times 1 Legal Analyses
In Bourne, we held that interrogation which does not contain express threats is not an unfair labor practice unless certain "fairly severe standards" are met showing that the very fact of interrogation was coercive.
International Wdwkr., Am., 3-10 v. N.L.R.B
380 F.2d 628 (D.C. Cir. 1967) Cited 11 times
No. 20526. Argued April 14, 1967. Decided June 15, 1967. Petition for Rehearing Denied August 17, 1967. Mr. John Silard, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Joseph L. Rauh, Jr., Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner. Mrs. Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, were on the brief, for respondent. Mr. George J. Tichy, Spokane, Wash., was on the brief for intervenor
International Union v. N.L.R.B
427 F.2d 1330 (6th Cir. 1970) Cited 8 times
No. 19745. June 5, 1970. Stanley Lubin, Detroit, Mich., for petitioner. Angelo V. Arcadipane, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Peter Ames Eveleth, Nan C. Bases, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief, for respondent. Before McCREE and COMBS, Circuit Judges, and McALLISTER, Senior Circuit Judge. McCREE, Circuit Judge. This petition to review an order of the National Labor Relations

Park Furniture Manufacturing Co.

8 Cited authorities

Holding "absent a . . . particularized and compelling reason for its actions, the State may not, consistently with the First and Fourteenth Amendments, make the simple public display . . . of single four-letter expletive [on a shirt] a criminal offense"

Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

Holding that a union cannot represent a group of employees for which it does not enjoy majority support

In Bourne, we held that interrogation which does not contain express threats is not an unfair labor practice unless certain "fairly severe standards" are met showing that the very fact of interrogation was coercive.