§

Parexel International, LLC

356 N.L.R.B. 516 (N.L.R.B. 2011)
Parexel International, LLC

14 Cited authorities

  1. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board

    313 U.S. 177 (1941)   Cited 872 times
    Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”

  2. Beth Israel Hospital v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    437 U.S. 483 (1978)   Cited 221 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, in the context of solicitation rules, such circumstances are required to justify restrictions on solicitation during nonworking time

  3. Central Hardware Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    407 U.S. 539 (1972)   Cited 142 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Finding that retail store parking lot was not "open to the public" and that the retail store could exclude nonemployee union members from parking lot

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fant Milling Co.

    360 U.S. 301 (1959)   Cited 106 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an untimely allegation of an unlawful unilateral wage increase was sufficiently related to a timely refusal-to-bargain charge, because the wage increase "largely influenced" the Board's finding that an unlawful refusal to bargain had occurred

  5. Prill v. N.L.R.B

    755 F.2d 941 (D.C. Cir. 1985)   Cited 80 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Prill v. NLRB, 755 F.2d 941, 948 (D.C. Cir. 1985), the D.C. Circuit remanded a case to the agency because "a regulation [was] based on an incorrect view of applicable law."

  6. Aroostook County v. N.L.R.B

    81 F.3d 209 (D.C. Cir. 1996)   Cited 18 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding NLRB's jurisdiction under 29 U.S.C. § 158, part of the National Labor Relations Act, over an employer

  7. Prill v. N.L.R.B

    835 F.2d 1481 (D.C. Cir. 1987)   Cited 27 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that an employee takes concerted action “when he acts with the actual participation or on the authority of his co-workers”

  8. Pergament United Sales, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    920 F.2d 130 (2d Cir. 1990)   Cited 20 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "due process is satisfied when a complaint gives a respondent fair notice . . . and when the conduct implicated in the alleged violation has been fully and fairly litigated"

  9. Compuware Corporation v. National Relations

    134 F.3d 1285 (6th Cir. 1998)   Cited 12 times
    Holding that no specific authorization was needed to show concerted activity where an employee had "almost from the beginning of his employment . . . discussed . . . problems with other employees" and made objections on behalf of other employees for their mutual aid or protection

  10. Cornelio v. Natl. Labor

    276 F. App'x 608 (9th Cir. 2008)   Cited 1 times

    No. 06-74745. Argued and Submitted April 11, 2008. Filed May 1, 2008. Bradley H. Bagshaw, Scott Edward Collins, David Carl Bratz, Gail M. Luhn, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner. Jill A. Griffin, Jason Walta, Washington, DC, for Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. NLRB No. 19-CA-28831. Before: REINHARDT, McKEOWN, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th