§

Paramount Cap Manufacturing Co.

119 N.L.R.B. 785 (N.L.R.B. 1957)
Paramount Cap Manufacturing Co.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Reed Prince MFG

    205 F.2d 131 (1st Cir. 1953)   Cited 118 times
    In Reed Prince, supra, this court affirmed the Board's finding of refusal to bargain in good faith only "[a]fter an attentive review of the entire record of the bargaining negotiations."

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Whittier Mills Co.

    111 F.2d 474 (5th Cir. 1940)   Cited 67 times
    Interpreting Virginian Railway's holding as “[w]here with fair opportunity to all members of the unit to vote, a majority do vote, they are, so to speak, a quorum to settle the matter, and the majority of that quorum binds those not voting, and suffices to select the bargaining representative of the unit”

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Textile Mach. Works

    214 F.2d 929 (3d Cir. 1954)   Cited 35 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Textile Machine Works, Inc., 1954, 214 F.2d 929 this court held that a complaint against Textile, alleging violations by it of Section 8(a)(1), (3), 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(a)(1), (3) of the National Labor Relations Act, was barred by the time limitation imposed by Section 10(b), 29 U.S.C.A. § 160(b), where workers had requested reinstatement rather than employment as new employees.

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Natl. Motor B. Co.

    105 F.2d 652 (9th Cir. 1939)   Cited 39 times

    No. 8869. June 2, 1939. As Amended June 15, 1939. On Petition for the Enforcement of, and on Petition to Review and Set Aside, an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Proceeding by the National Labor Relations Board, petitioner, against the National Motor Bearing Company, for enforcement of an order issued by the Board, consolidated with a proceeding by the International Association of Machinists and Production Workers, Local 1518, affiliated with International Association of Machinists,

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Clausen

    188 F.2d 439 (3d Cir. 1951)   Cited 23 times

    No. 10374. Argued March 6, 1951. Filed April 2, 1951. Rehearing Denied June 8, 1951. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel (Fannie M. Boyls, and Samuel M. Singer, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for National Labor Relations Board. Irving Herman, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Conrad A. Falvello, Hazelton, Pa., for respondent. Rocco C. Falvello, Hazleton, Pa., on the brief, for respondent-appellee. Before MARIS, McLAUGHLIN

  6. National Lbr. Rel. Bd. v. Piqua M. W. Prod

    109 F.2d 552 (6th Cir. 1940)   Cited 28 times
    In N. L. R. B. v. Piqua Munising Wood Products Co., 109 F.2d 552, 557, the United States Circuit Court said: "All that is requisite in a valid complaint before the Board is that there be a plain statement of the things claimed to constitute an unfair labor practice that respondent may be put upon his defense."

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Brady Aviation Corp.

    224 F.2d 23 (5th Cir. 1955)   Cited 6 times

    No. 15382. June 30, 1955. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Ruth V. Reel, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Irving L. Goldberg, Ben Pickering, Dallas, Tex., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, JONES, Circuit Judge, and CHRISTENBERRY, District Judge. HUTCHESON, Chief Judge. In a decision affirming the findings of the examiner, that respondent had violated Sec. 8(a)(3) and (1) of the Labor Management Act, 29