§

PARAGON SYSTEMS, INC.

362 NLRB No. 182 (N.L.R.B. 2015)
PARAGON SYSTEMS, INC.

21 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Department of Navy v. Egan

    484 U.S. 518 (1988)   Cited 534 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "unless Congress specifically has provided otherwise," "outside nonexpert bod[ies]," including courts, cannot attempt to substitute their judgments for those of the executive branch on matters of national security

  3. Goodyear Atomic Corp. v. Miller

    486 U.S. 174 (1988)   Cited 254 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that "a federally owned facility performing a federal function is shielded from direct state regulation, even though the federal function is carried out by a private contractor, unless Congress clearly authorizes such regulation"

  4. Eastex, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    437 U.S. 556 (1978)   Cited 196 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a newsletter that "urg[ed] employees to write their legislators to oppose incorporation of the state 'right-to-work' statute into a revised state constitution," "criticiz[ed] a Presidential veto of an increase in the federal minimum wage and urg[ed] employees to register to vote" was protected concerted activity

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Relco Locomotives, Inc.

    734 F.3d 764 (8th Cir. 2013)   Cited 95 times
    Holding that a challenge to the composition of the National Labor Relations Board under the Recess Appointments Clause was not jurisdictional and could be forfeited if not raised to the Board

  7. Canning v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    705 F.3d 490 (D.C. Cir. 2013)   Cited 96 times   37 Legal Analyses
    Holding that such a challenge qualifies as an "extraordinary circumstance"

  8. Labor Board v. Burnup Sims

    379 U.S. 21 (1964)   Cited 106 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Canning

    570 U.S. 916 (2013)   Cited 11 times   2 Legal Analyses

    No. 12–1281. 2013-06-24 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, petitioner, v. Noel CANNING, et al. Case below, 705 F.3d 490. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit granted. In addition to the questions presented by the petition, the parties are directed to brief and argue the following question: Whether the President's recess-appointment power may be exercised when the Senate is convening every three days in pro forma sessions.

  10. Ryan v. Reno

    168 F.3d 520 (D.C. Cir. 1999)   Cited 72 times
    Holding that “under Egan an adverse employment action based on denial or revocation of a security clearance is not actionable under Title VII”