§

PARAGON SYSTEMS, INC.

10-CA-095371 (N.L.R.B. Feb. 7, 2014)
PARAGON SYSTEMS, INC.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Department of Navy v. Egan

    484 U.S. 518 (1988)   Cited 534 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "unless Congress specifically has provided otherwise," "outside nonexpert bod[ies]," including courts, cannot attempt to substitute their judgments for those of the executive branch on matters of national security

  2. Goodyear Atomic Corp. v. Miller

    486 U.S. 174 (1988)   Cited 255 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that "a federally owned facility performing a federal function is shielded from direct state regulation, even though the federal function is carried out by a private contractor, unless Congress clearly authorizes such regulation"

  3. Eastex, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    437 U.S. 556 (1978)   Cited 196 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a newsletter that "urg[ed] employees to write their legislators to oppose incorporation of the state 'right-to-work' statute into a revised state constitution," "criticiz[ed] a Presidential veto of an increase in the federal minimum wage and urg[ed] employees to register to vote" was protected concerted activity

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  5. Canning v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    705 F.3d 490 (D.C. Cir. 2013)   Cited 96 times   37 Legal Analyses
    Holding that such a challenge qualifies as an "extraordinary circumstance"

  6. Labor Board v. Burnup Sims

    379 U.S. 21 (1964)   Cited 106 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"

  7. Palace Sports Entm't, Inc. v. NLRB

    411 F.3d 212 (D.C. Cir. 2005)   Cited 6 times

    No. 04-1261, 04-1276. Argued March 18, 2005. Decided May 31, 2005. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Robert M. Vercruysse argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Gary S. Fealk. David A. Fleischer, Senior Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Arthur F. Rosenfeld, General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Assistant General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong

  8. W. W. Grainger, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    582 F.2d 1118 (7th Cir. 1978)   Cited 11 times

    No. 77-1532. Argued December 7, 1977. Decided August 15, 1978. Charles C. Jackson, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. Frederick Havard, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before CUMMINGS and SPRECHER, Circuit Judges, and CAMPBELL, Senior District Judge. Senior District Judge William J. Campbell of the Northern District of Illinois is sitting by designation. WILLIAM J. CAMPBELL, Senior District Judge. W. W. Grainger, Inc., has petitioned to review