§

Paradyme Alloys, LLC v. General Motors Corp.

No. 91158477 (T.T.A.B. Apr. 13, 2004)
Paradyme Alloys, LLC v. General Motors Corp.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Novamedix, Ltd. v. NDM Acquisition Corp.

    166 F.3d 1177 (Fed. Cir. 1999)   Cited 30 times
    Concluding the UCC did not apply to a settlement agreement that provided for the delivery of certain inventory because its primary purpose was to settle patent infringement claims

  2. Oliver v. Rogers

    976 S.W.2d 792 (Tex. App. 1998)   Cited 25 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a lack of a time limitation did not render noncompete unreasonable as a matter of law

  3. Michigan National Bank v. Laskowski

    228 Mich. App. 710 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998)   Cited 19 times
    Holding the construction of an unambiguous contract to be a question of law for the court

  4. Opryland USA v. Great American Music Show

    970 F.2d 847 (Fed. Cir. 1992)   Cited 24 times
    In Opryland, Opryland USA opposed the registration of "THE CAROLINA OPRY," arguing that the term was confusingly similar to Opryland's own marks.

  5. Olde Tyme Foods, Inc. v. Roundy's, Inc.

    961 F.2d 200 (Fed. Cir. 1992)   Cited 12 times
    Stating that "[a]s to strength of a mark . . . [third-party] registration evidence may not be given any weight . . . [because they are] not evidence of what happens in the market place"

  6. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 359,902 times   954 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss

  7. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 336,252 times   161 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit