Paperworkers Local 987 (Sun Chemical Corp.)

9 Cited authorities

  1. Communications Workers of America v. Beck

    487 U.S. 735 (1988)   Cited 279 times   45 Legal Analyses
    Holding that non-members could not be charged "to support union activities beyond those germane to collective bargaining, contract administration, and grievance adjustment"
  2. Labor Board v. General Motors

    373 U.S. 734 (1963)   Cited 192 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that termination is also the appropriate sanction for failure to pay fees under an agency-shop clause
  3. Virginia Electric Co. v. Board

    319 U.S. 533 (1943)   Cited 328 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Emphasizing that the Board's remedial power "is not limited to the illustrative example of one type of permissible affirmative order," such as backpay, and cautioning that the "particular means by which the effects of unfair labor practices are to be expunged are matters 'for the Board not the courts to determine'" (first citing Phelps Dodge, 313 U.S. at 187, 189; then quoting Machinists, 311 U.S. at 82)
  4. Pattern Makers' League v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    473 U.S. 95 (1985)   Cited 76 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Upholding the NLRB's interpretation of the Act
  5. Scofield v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    394 U.S. 423 (1969)   Cited 117 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Upholding union rule, enforceable by fines and expulsion, imposing limitation on immediate pay that members could receive for piecework because Court found no "impairment of statutory labor policy"
  6. Gilpin v. Afscme, Afl-Cio

    875 F.2d 1310 (7th Cir. 1989)   Cited 77 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that nonunion employees' claim for restitution was actually for punitive damages when the union had acted lawfully by conferring benefits to the employees
  7. International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    133 F.3d 1012 (7th Cir. 1998)   Cited 24 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Noting that in challenge to extra-unit fees, litigation expenses were "treated separately by the parties but [are] analytically identical, as far as we can see"
  8. Lowary v. Lexington Local Bd. of Educ

    854 F.2d 131 (6th Cir. 1988)   Cited 26 times
    Granting injunction against all dues collections in the absence of a valid Hudson plan
  9. Buzenius v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    124 F.3d 788 (6th Cir. 1997)   Cited 4 times

    No. 96-5139 Argued: February 7, 1997 Decided and Filed: September 8, 1997 Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 24 John C. Scully, (argued and briefed), National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Springfield, VA, for Petitioner. Aileen A. Armstrong, (briefed), Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Deborah E. Shrager, (argued and briefed), National Labor Relations Board, Appellate Court Branch, Washington, DC, Margaret Gaines Neigus, (briefed), National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, for Respondent