§

Pandel-Bradford, Inc.

214 N.L.R.B. 736 (N.L.R.B. 1974)
Pandel-Bradford, Inc.

2 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  2. Wilkinson Manufacturing Co. v. N.L.R.B

    456 F.2d 298 (8th Cir. 1972)   Cited 15 times

    Nos. 71-1021, 71-1030. March 1, 1972. Charles E. Sykes, Lincoln, Neb., for petitioner Wilkinson Mfg. Co. William A. Jolley, Kansas City, Mo., for petitioner United Steelworkers. Howard C. Hay, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Appeal from Petitions for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before VAN OOSTERHOUT, BRIGHT and STEPHENSON, Circuit Judges. BRIGHT, Circuit Judge. This labor-management controversy stems from the efforts of United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO