§
Pan-Oston Co.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Bockes v. Fields

    510 U.S. 1092 (1994)   Cited 36 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 93-818. January 24, 1994, October TERM, 1993. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 999 F. 2d 788.

  4. Bourne v. N.L.R.B

    332 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 93 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Bourne, we held that interrogation which does not contain express threats is not an unfair labor practice unless certain "fairly severe standards" are met showing that the very fact of interrogation was coercive.

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Donkin's Inn, Inc.

    532 F.2d 138 (9th Cir. 1976)   Cited 41 times

    No. 74-3252. March 4, 1976. Rehearing Denied April 28, 1976. Edmund Cooke, Atty. (argued), NLRB, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Robert S. Rose (argued), of Harris Aranda, Marina Del Rey, Cal., for respondent. Before CHAMBERS, TRASK and WALLACE, Circuit Judges. OPINION TRASK, Circuit Judge: This is an application for Enforcement of an Order of the NLRB, issued on October 9, 1974, against Donkin's Inn, Inc. (hereafter, "the Company") for certain violations of sections 8(a)(5) and 8(a)(1) of the

  6. Millard Processing Services, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    2 F.3d 258 (8th Cir. 1993)   Cited 18 times
    Recognizing that election surveillance may be problematic, but enforcing Board bargaining order where cable television employee, who was not a union agent, videotaped employees during election campaign and union official explained that cameraman was not affiliated with the union to every employee who asked

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Brookshire Grocery Co.

    919 F.2d 359 (5th Cir. 1990)   Cited 13 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that employer could discharge employee under the NLRA for taking company papers

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Crown Laundry Dry Cleaners, Inc.

    437 F.2d 290 (5th Cir. 1971)   Cited 21 times

    No. 24535. January 22, 1971. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Paul Elkind, Atty., NLRB, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Richard C. Keenan, New Orleans, La., for respondents. Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and WISDOM and MORGAN, Circuit Judges. WISDOM, Circuit Judge: This case comes to us on a petition filed by the National Labor Relations Board to adjudge the respondents, Crown Laundry Dry Cleaners, Inc. and Gulf Linen Service, Inc., in civil contempt of this Court for having

  9. Intertype Company v. N.L.R.B

    371 F.2d 787 (4th Cir. 1967)   Cited 1 times

    No. 10636. Argued December 8, 1966. Decided January 12, 1967. Kenneth C. McGuiness, Washington, D.C. (Flournoy L. Largent, Jr., Winchester, Va., and Vedder, Price, Kaufman, Kammholz McGuiness, Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. Elliott C. Lichtman, Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Gary Green and Morton Namrow, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, on brief), for respondent

  10. Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest

    26 U.S.C. § 6621   Cited 1,873 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions