§
Pan-Abode, Inc.

26 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,674 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Edison Co. v. Labor Board

    305 U.S. 197 (1938)   Cited 19,302 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a Board order cannot be grounded in hearsay

  3. Ford Motor Co. v. Huffman

    345 U.S. 330 (1953)   Cited 881 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union acting in its representative capacity owes a duty of fair representation to those on whose behalf it acts

  4. Labor Board v. Columbian Co.

    306 U.S. 292 (1939)   Cited 994 times
    Defining substantial evidence

  5. Nash v. Florida Industrial Comm'n

    389 U.S. 235 (1967)   Cited 141 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding preempted an administrative policy interpreting presumably valid state unemployment insurance law exception for "labor disputes" to include proceedings under NLRB complaints

  6. Trailmobile Co. v. Whirls

    331 U.S. 40 (1947)   Cited 111 times
    Noting that the “interpretation of statutes cannot safely be made to rest upon mute intermediate legislative maneuvers”

  7. Aeronautical Lodge v. Campbell

    337 U.S. 521 (1949)   Cited 95 times
    In Campbell, the Supreme Court held that the Selective Service Act, which required employers to return a veteran to the same position he held prior to entering military service "without loss of seniority" did not render unlawful a clause in the collective-bargaining agreement providing for superseniority for "union chairmen" over veterans in case of layoff.

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. McGahey

    233 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1956)   Cited 133 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. McGahey, 233 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1956), this court described casual and moderate inquiries, even as to union preference, absent evidence indicating that the employee has reason to consider the inquiries a threat of reprisals, as not constituting an unfair labor practice in violation of § 8(a)(1).

  9. Washington Coach Co. v. Labor Bd.

    301 U.S. 142 (1937)   Cited 75 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 469. Argued February 10, 1937. Decided April 12, 1937. 1. A corporation engaged in the business of transporting passengers and express, for hire, between points in the District of Columbia and points in Virginia, held an instrumentality of interstate commerce and subject to provisions of the National Labor Relations Act against discharge of employees because of their membership in a union and their advocacy of collective bargaining

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Houston Chronicle

    211 F.2d 848 (5th Cir. 1954)   Cited 54 times
    Subcontracting union work

  11. Section 556 - Hearings; presiding employees; powers and duties; burden of proof; evidence; record as basis of decision

    5 U.S.C. § 556   Cited 909 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Specifying that presiding officers may either be the agency, a member of the body that comprises the agency, i.e., a commissioner, or an ALJ