§

Palms Hotel & Casino

344 N.L.R.B. 1363 (N.L.R.B. 2005)
Palms Hotel & Casino

10 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 657 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Brown v. Louisiana

    383 U.S. 131 (1966)   Cited 325 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a silent sit-in to protest racial segregation in a public library was protected expression

  3. Labor Board v. Babcock Wilcox Co.

    351 U.S. 105 (1956)   Cited 294 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board could not require an employer to allow non-employee union representatives to enter the employer's parking lot

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  5. Adtranz ABB Daimler-Benz Transportation, N.A. v. National Labor Relations

    253 F.3d 19 (D.C. Cir. 2001)   Cited 20 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding "derogatory racial or sexual epithets" are not entitled to NLRA protection even when made within the context of union-protected activity

  6. FPC Holdings, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    64 F.3d 935 (4th Cir. 1995)   Cited 23 times
    Holding that company's knowledge of employee's union involvement was properly inferred from the fact that the employees discussed a planned union meeting openly in the company's warehouse and over the company's CB radio at a time when the company was closely monitoring one of the employee's behavior

  7. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

  8. Manimark Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    7 F.3d 547 (6th Cir. 1993)   Cited 10 times
    In Manimark, the employee was summoned to a meeting about a change to the company's compensation policy that affected only him.

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Miller

    341 F.2d 870 (2d Cir. 1965)   Cited 15 times

    Nos. 274, 306, Dockets 29186, 29296. Argued January 6, 1965. Decided March 1, 1965. Elliott Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B.), for petitioner. Sanford H. Markham, New York City (Michael P. Graff, New York City, on the brief), for respondents. Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and WATERMAN and HAYS, Circuit Judges. HAYS, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board

  10. Bank of St. Louis v. N.L.R.B

    456 F.2d 1234 (8th Cir. 1972)   Cited 5 times

    No. 71-1483. March 27, 1972. Gaylord C. Burke, Dennis C. Donnelly, St. Louis, Mo., for petitioner; Bryan, Cave, McPheeters McRoberts, St. Louis, Mo., of counsel. Marjorie S. Gofreed, Atty., Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N. L. R. B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before GIBSON, HEANEY and ROSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This is a petition to review an order of the National