§

Palagonia Baker Co.

339 N.L.R.B. 515 (N.L.R.B. 2003)
Palagonia Baker Co.

17 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Action Automotive, Inc.

    469 U.S. 490 (1985)   Cited 44 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding Board rule excluding from bargaining unit employees who are relatives of management

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Nueva Engineering, Inc.

    761 F.2d 961 (4th Cir. 1985)   Cited 46 times
    Holding that the Brady rule is inapplicable to proceedings under the National Labor Relations Act, since the Act "is civil in nature, does not involve potential incarceration and violation of the Act does not carry with it the stigma of a criminal conviction"

  4. Dreis Krump Mfg. Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    544 F.2d 320 (7th Cir. 1976)   Cited 48 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding Board's refusal to defer on ground that award would violate employee's § 7 rights.

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Thor Power Tool Co.

    351 F.2d 584 (7th Cir. 1965)   Cited 68 times
    Concluding that "when the entire record is considered there was substantial evidence to support the Board's finding that [employee's] discharge was the result of his having presented a grievance to the management" even though employee was overheard referring to company's superintendent as "the horse's ass" and was thereafter summarily discharged

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours

    750 F.2d 524 (6th Cir. 1984)   Cited 33 times
    Finding that a supervisor's act of questioning an employee as to why he supported the union, as well as the supervisor's statement to the employee that he had supervisor potential if he did not support the union, rose to the level of coercive conduct

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Florida Medical Ctr., Inc.

    576 F.2d 666 (5th Cir. 1978)   Cited 34 times
    In NLRB v. Florida Medical Center Inc., 576 F.2d 666, 674 (5th Cir. 1978), the court pointed out that when the Board does not accept the findings of the ALJ, the reviewing court has an obligation to examine the evidence and findings of the Board more critically than it would if the Board and the ALJ were in agreement.

  8. Felix Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    251 F.3d 1051 (D.C. Cir. 2001)   Cited 6 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Felix, an employee telephoned his supervisor to inquire about additional wages the employer owed him for working night shifts.

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Chicago Metallic Corp.

    794 F.2d 527 (9th Cir. 1986)   Cited 14 times
    In Chicago Metallic, unlike the situation presented here, the employee at issue was assigned no manual chores and had the authority and discretion to take disciplinary action against employees.

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Max Factor and Co.

    640 F.2d 197 (9th Cir. 1980)   Cited 17 times
    In Max Factor this court speculated that rejection of the Electronics Reproduction presumption did not require adoption of the Banyard criteria.