§

Painters Local Union No. 585

159 N.L.R.B. 1362 (N.L.R.B. 1966)
Painters Local Union No. 585

5 Cited authorities

  1. Edison Co. v. Labor Board

    305 U.S. 197 (1938)   Cited 19,306 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a Board order cannot be grounded in hearsay

  2. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board

    313 U.S. 177 (1941)   Cited 871 times
    Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Hudson Pulp Paper Corporation

    273 F.2d 660 (5th Cir. 1960)   Cited 28 times

    No. 17703. January 12, 1960. Alfred Brummel, Atty., National Labor Relations Bd., Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Bd., Frederick U. Reel, Fred J. Hahn, Attys., National Labor Relations Bd., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Theo. Hamilton, Jacksonville, Fla., for respondents. Before HUTCHESON, CAMERON and JONES, Circuit Judges. JONES, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board has

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Jamestown Sterling

    211 F.2d 725 (2d Cir. 1954)   Cited 29 times

    No. 170, Docket 22862. Argued March 9, 1954. Decided April 5, 1954. George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Owsley Vose and Jean Engstrom, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Rogerson Hewes, J. Russell Rogerson, Jamestown, N.Y., for respondent. Before CLARK, MEDINA and HARLAN, Circuit Judges. MEDINA, Circuit Judge. This case involves a more or less typical controversy between employer and employees. In the week of July 7, 1952, following the shutdown of the plant in the Village of Falconer

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Texas Natural

    253 F.2d 322 (5th Cir. 1958)   Cited 4 times

    No. 16665. March 18, 1958. Stephen Leonard, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., William J. Avrutis, Atty., Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. C.A. Kothe, W.H. Eyssen, Jr., Tulsa, Okla., for respondent. Before TUTTLE, JONES and BROWN, Circuit Judges. JONES, Circuit Judge. Since so much in this case is dependent upon the factual situation, it becomes necessary to relate the chain of events in some detail. The respondent, Texas