Painters Local 249, Brotherhood of Painters, Etc.

11 Cited authorities

Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council
341 U.S. 675 (1951) Cited 494 times 1 Legal Analyses
Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce
Electrical Workers v. Labor Board
341 U.S. 694 (1951) Cited 246 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that the prohibition of picketing in furtherance of unlawful objectives is not an abridgement of free speech
Carpenters' Union v. Labor Board
357 U.S. 93 (1958) Cited 201 times
Rejecting Government position that we should defer to the Board's interpretation of the Interstate Commerce Act
Communications Workers v. N.L.R.B
362 U.S. 479 (1960) Cited 70 times
Striking part of an NLRB order requiring a union to refrain from coercing employees of "any other employer" where the NLRB had found that the union had coerced only the employees of the named employer
Farris v. Farris Engineering Corp.
7 N.J. 487 (N.J. 1951) Cited 41 times
Holding that a partnership is created "when persons join together their money, goods, labor or skill for the purpose of carrying on a trade, profession or business, and where there is community of interest in the profits or losses."
Cyrus v. Cyrus
242 Minn. 180 (Minn. 1954) Cited 36 times
In Cyrus, the Minnesota Supreme Court examined the question of whether one partner's pre-partnership real estate became property of the partnership.
Truck Drivers, L.U. No. 728, Etc. v. N.L.R.B
265 F.2d 439 (5th Cir. 1959) Cited 9 times
No. 17288. April 8, 1959. Rehearing Denied June 11, 1959. Edwin Pearce, John S. Patton, Poole, Pearce Hall, Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner. Franklin C. Milliken, Atty., Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Norton J. Come, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and BROWN and WISDOM, Circuit Judges. WISDOM, Circuit Judge. The matter before us concerns a secondary
N.L.R.B. v. Springfield Bldg. C. Trades C
262 F.2d 494 (1st Cir. 1958) Cited 8 times
No. 5395. December 31, 1958. Arnold Ordman, Washington, D.C., with whom Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioner. John I. Robinson, Springfield, Mass., with whom Norris E. Dibble, Springfield, Mass., was on the brief for respondents. Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, and WOODBURY and HARTIGAN, Circuit Judges. WOODBURY, Circuit Judge. The president of a labor organization
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. United Steelworkers
250 F.2d 184 (1st Cir. 1957) Cited 8 times
In N.L.R.B. v. United Steelworkers, 1 Cir., 250 F.2d 184, pickets followed a primary employer's truck to the premises of a neutral employer.
Roberts v. White
97 A.2d 245 (Vt. 1953) Cited 12 times
Explaining that "[a]n agreement to share the profits and losses of an adventure is an essential element of a partnership"

Painters Local 249, Brotherhood of Painters, Etc.

11 Cited authorities

Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce

Holding that the prohibition of picketing in furtherance of unlawful objectives is not an abridgement of free speech

Rejecting Government position that we should defer to the Board's interpretation of the Interstate Commerce Act

Striking part of an NLRB order requiring a union to refrain from coercing employees of "any other employer" where the NLRB had found that the union had coerced only the employees of the named employer

Holding that a partnership is created "when persons join together their money, goods, labor or skill for the purpose of carrying on a trade, profession or business, and where there is community of interest in the profits or losses."

In Cyrus, the Minnesota Supreme Court examined the question of whether one partner's pre-partnership real estate became property of the partnership.

In N.L.R.B. v. United Steelworkers, 1 Cir., 250 F.2d 184, pickets followed a primary employer's truck to the premises of a neutral employer.

Explaining that "[a]n agreement to share the profits and losses of an adventure is an essential element of a partnership"