Painters District Council No. 36, AFL-CIO
2 Cited authorities
Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.
356 U.S. 342 (1958) Cited 296 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under § 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."
N.L.R.B. v. Am. Compress Ware
350 F.2d 365 (5th Cir. 1965) Cited 8 timesNo. 21365. July 12, 1965. Rehearing Denied September 7, 1965. Herman M. Levy, Atty., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Joe P. Mathews, Dallas, Tex., for respondent. Before RIVES, BROWN and WISDOM, Circuit Judges. RIVES, Circuit Judge. The Board petitions the Court for enforcement of its order which found that the Respondent Company violated section