R. G. Barry Corp. v. Mushroom Makers, Inc.

Holding that to prove an antitrust violation under the rule of reason the plaintiff must show defendants' conduct actually adversely affected competition

Woelke & Romero Framing, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

Holding that "the Court of Appeals lack[ed] jurisdiction to review objections that were not urged before the Board"

National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

Holding that union employees' refusal to install third-party manufacturer's product was not prohibited under § 158(b)(B), because it was an action "pressuring the [union members'] employer for agreements regulating relations between [the employer] and his own employees"

Connell Co. v. Plumbers Steamfitters

Holding that an agreement between a union and a nonlabor party, which is wholly-unrelated to any collective-bargaining effort on the part of the union and which operates or threatens to operate as a restraint on trade, may be the basis for a federal antitrust suit

Radio Union v. Broadcast Serv

Holding that two entities were a single employer and therefore that their gross receipts could be totaled together to establish jurisdiction under the National Labor Relations Act

Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce

South Prairie Constr. v. Operating Engineers

Holding that appeals court usurped role of NLRB by reversing Board's legal conclusion and proceeding to decide issue of fact that should be decided by Board in the first instance

Berman Enterprises v. Local 333

Holding an "affiliates" clause much like the Coal Lands clause legal under rule of reason analysis

Charles D. Bonanno Linen Service, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

Holding that courts must not "substitute [their] judgment for those of the Board with respect to the issues that Congress intended the Board should resolve"

Ernest v. U.S.