§
Page Litho, Inc.

12 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 712 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. C & C Plywood Corp.

    385 U.S. 421 (1967)   Cited 117 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB has the authority to interpret CBAs in the first instance where its interpretation is for the purpose of “enforc[ing] a statutory right which Congress considered necessary to allow labor and management to get on with the process of reaching fair terms and conditions of employment”

  4. American Federation of Television & Radio Artists v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    395 F.2d 622 (D.C. Cir. 1968)   Cited 103 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Applying Taft

  5. N.L.R.B. v. New Jersey Bell Telephone Co.

    936 F.2d 144 (3d Cir. 1991)   Cited 17 times

    Nos. 90-3857, 91-3060. Submitted Under Third Circuit Rule 12(6) June 7, 1991. Decided June 25, 1991. As Amended June 28, 1991. James F. Brady, New Jersey Bell Telephone Co., Newark, N.J., for respondent. Howard E. Perlstein, Richard A. Cohen, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Ellen Dichner, Gladstein, Reif Meginniss, New York City, for intervenor. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Before SLOVITER, Chief Judge, and GREENBERG and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges. OPINION OF THE

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Burkart Foam, Inc.

    848 F.2d 825 (7th Cir. 1988)   Cited 20 times
    Holding that an employer’s unwillingness to deviate from its position kept the offer on the table

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Pearl Bookbinding Company, Inc.

    517 F.2d 1108 (1st Cir. 1975)   Cited 32 times
    In Pearl Bookbinding, the court considered options such as handbilling and enlistment of a number of employees whose names the union did have.

  8. N.L.R.B. v. C.K. Smith Co., Inc.

    569 F.2d 162 (1st Cir. 1977)   Cited 25 times
    Noting that "the sale of essentially similar products via similar distribution methods is also probative of integration"

  9. Chicago Tribune Co. v. N.L.R.B

    965 F.2d 244 (7th Cir. 1992)   Cited 6 times

    Nos. 91-2750, 91-2916. Argued April 1, 1992. Decided May 29, 1992. Rehearing Denied June 24, 1992. Elizabeth Kinney, N.L.R.B., Region 13, Chicago, Ill., Aileen A. Armstrong, Linda J. Dreeben, David Seid (argued), N.L.R.B., Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, John C. Truesdale, N.L.R.B., Contempt Litigation Branch, Washington, D.C. and Paul Bosanac, N.L.R.B., Region 30, Milwaukee, Wis., for N.L.R.B. R. Eddie Wayland (argued), E. Andrew Norwood, King Ballow, Nashville, Tenn. and William O. Howe

  10. Sign Pictorial U.L. 1175 v. N.L.R.B

    419 F.2d 726 (D.C. Cir. 1969)   Cited 25 times
    In Sign and Pictorial Union v. NLRB, 419 F.2d 726 (D.C. Cir. 1969), strike replacements had been harassed, threatened, and assaulted by striking employees in the presence of a union representative.

  11. Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest

    26 U.S.C. § 6621   Cited 1,905 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions