Packard Motor Car Co.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Pepper v. Litton

    308 U.S. 295 (1939)   Cited 1,858 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that bankruptcy court has equitable power to disallow or subordinate state judgment
  2. Board v. Hearst Publications

    322 U.S. 111 (1944)   Cited 791 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Determining whether newsboys were independent contractors or employees under the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA")
  3. H.J. Heinz Co. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 514 (1941)   Cited 241 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In H.J. Heinz Co. v. N.L.R.B., 311 U.S. 514, 61 S.Ct. 320, 85 L.Ed. 309 and Cox v. Gatliff Coal Co., D.C., 59 F. Supp. 882, affirmed 6 Cir., 152 F.2d 52, it was stated that the Act contemplated that a collective bargaining agreement be in writing.
  4. Meinhard v. Salmon

    249 N.Y. 458 (N.Y. 1928)   Cited 1,177 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding a co-venturer breached his duty of loyalty when he extended the lease on commercial property and excluded his co-venturer from the opportunity
  5. New York Trust Co. v. Eisner

    256 U.S. 345 (1921)   Cited 325 times
    Holding that the tax was not direct even though the government imposed it on the estate rather than the recipient
  6. Michoud v. Girod

    45 U.S. 503 (1846)   Cited 115 times
    In Michoud v. Girod, 45 U.S. 503, 553, 557 (1846), for example, the beneficiary's heirs sought to set aside a transaction in which the trustee purchased the testator's entire estate: the Supreme Court declared the sale void as fraudulent "without any further inquiry."
  7. Matter of Leenhouts v. Shell E. Petroleum Products

    247 App. Div. 917 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

    April, 1936. Present — Hill, P.J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ. Motion to dismiss appeal denied, on the ground that the complete stenographic minutes have never been supplied to the appellants. If this case was decided, as appellants assert, without consideration of the entire record by the referee or the Industrial Board, then and in that event it seems to the court that a determination should be made on the merits after consideration of all the evidence.