§

Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company

262 N.L.R.B. 1048 (N.L.R.B. 1982)
Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company

4 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. Weingarten, Inc.

    420 U.S. 251 (1975)   Cited 434 times   64 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer commits an unfair labor practice by compelling an employee to attend an investigatory meeting that could lead to discipline without allowing the employee to bring a union witness

  2. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. N.L.R.B

    667 F.2d 470 (5th Cir. 1982)   Cited 10 times
    Holding that employer did not violate employee's right to union representation at investigatory interview where employer requested that the representative not interfere with questioning because the representative was present at the interview, was allowed time to consult with the employee prior to the interview, and was free to make any additions, suggestions, or clarifications after the interview

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Texaco, Inc.

    659 F.2d 124 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 6 times

    No. 80-7692. Argued and Submitted August 6, 1981. Decided October 16, 1981. Rehearing Denied November 20, 1981. Joseph A. Schwachter, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (argued), for petitioner; Howard E. Perlstein, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. William D. Evans, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before SCHROEDER and ALARCON, Circuit Judges and HATFIELD, District Judge. Honorable Paul G. Hatfield, United States District

  4. Climax Molybdenum Co. v. N.L.R.B

    584 F.2d 360 (10th Cir. 1978)   Cited 4 times
    Denying enforcement of Board's order where union had a policy of noncooperation pursuant to which union officials, including the official who requested the pre-interview consultation, "had urged [employees] not to cooperate with management in any investigatory interviews"