§

Pacific Maritime Association

155 N.L.R.B. 1231 (N.L.R.B. 1965)
Pacific Maritime Association

10 Cited authorities

  1. Conley v. Gibson

    355 U.S. 41 (1957)   Cited 59,255 times   25 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "a complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief"

  2. Ford Motor Co. v. Huffman

    345 U.S. 330 (1953)   Cited 881 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union acting in its representative capacity owes a duty of fair representation to those on whose behalf it acts

  3. Steele v. L. N.R. Co.

    323 U.S. 192 (1944)   Cited 959 times
    Holding that a labor organization must represent all members of a "craft or class of employees . . . regardless of their union affiliations or want of them"

  4. Labor Board v. Burnup Sims

    379 U.S. 21 (1964)   Cited 106 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Miranda Fuel Co., Inc.

    326 F.2d 172 (2d Cir. 1963)   Cited 98 times

    No. 73, Docket 26232. Argued October 21, 1963. Decided December 11, 1963. Melvin J. Welles, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Herman M. Levy, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Samuel J. Cohen, New York City (Jack Last and Cohen Weiss, New York City, on the brief), for respondent Union. Ruth

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Whitin Mach. Works

    204 F.2d 883 (1st Cir. 1953)   Cited 57 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Whitin Machine Works, 204 F.2d 883 (1st Cir.1953), for example, an assistant supervisor in his employer's accounting department was, upon a consideration of the nature of his work, determined not to be a supervisor for purposes of litigating his discharge from employment, and, therefore, he was entitled to the protections of the National Labor Relations Act. 204 F.2d at 886.

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Electric Steam Radiator Corp.

    321 F.2d 733 (6th Cir. 1963)   Cited 28 times
    Containing similar language

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Jamestown Sterling

    211 F.2d 725 (2d Cir. 1954)   Cited 29 times

    No. 170, Docket 22862. Argued March 9, 1954. Decided April 5, 1954. George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Owsley Vose and Jean Engstrom, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Rogerson Hewes, J. Russell Rogerson, Jamestown, N.Y., for respondent. Before CLARK, MEDINA and HARLAN, Circuit Judges. MEDINA, Circuit Judge. This case involves a more or less typical controversy between employer and employees. In the week of July 7, 1952, following the shutdown of the plant in the Village of Falconer

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Reed

    206 F.2d 184 (9th Cir. 1953)   Cited 13 times

    No. 13310. June 22, 1953. As Amended August 12, 1953. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., David P. Findling, Asso. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Fannie M. Boyls and Ruth C. Goldman, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Gardiner Johnson and Thomas E. Stanton, Jr., San Francisco, Cal., for respondent George W. Reed. Watson A. Garoni, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent In. Hod Carriers, etc. Before STEPHENS and POPE, Circuit Judges, and McCORMICK, District

  10. N.L.R.B. v. L. 212, Inter. U., United Auto

    295 F.2d 483 (6th Cir. 1961)

    No. 14473. October 17, 1961. Melvin Pollack, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Dominick L. Manoli, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Abraham A. Dash, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Gordon A. Gregory, Detroit, Mich. (Harold A. Cranefield, Redmond H. Roche, Jr., John A. Fillion, Detroit, Mich., on the brief; Cranefield, Roche Gregory, Detroit, Mich., of counsel), for respondent. Before MARTIN, McALLISTER and O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This cause came on to be heard on