§

Pacific Intercom Co.

255 N.L.R.B. 184 (N.L.R.B. 1981)
Pacific Intercom Co.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local Union No. 103, International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers

    434 U.S. 335 (1978)   Cited 286 times
    Affirming a cease and desist order issued by the National Labor Relations Board to a striking, uncertified union, which the union alleged was inconsistent with a prior ruling of the agency

  2. Machinists Local v. Labor Board

    362 U.S. 411 (1960)   Cited 276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Don Burgess Const. Corp.

    596 F.2d 378 (9th Cir. 1979)   Cited 101 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that section 10(b) limitations period begins to run when the employee "discovers, or in the exercise of reasonable diligence should have discovered, the acts constituting the alleged [violation]"

  4. Local No. 150, International Union of Operating Engineers v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    480 F.2d 1186 (D.C. Cir. 1973)   Cited 29 times

    No. 71-1689. June 20, 1973. Bernard M. Baum, Daniel S. Shulman, Robert H. Baum, Chicago, Ill., and J. Albert Woll, Washington, D.C., were on the brief for petitioner. Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., at the time the brief was filed, Charles N. Steele, and Alan D. Cirker, Washington, D.C., Attys., N.L.R.B., were on the brief for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before McGOWAN, Circuit Judge, and WINTER