§

Pacific Architects and Engineers Incorporated (PAE)

28-CA-170331 (N.L.R.B. Dec. 5, 2016)
Pacific Architects and Engineers Incorporated (PAE)

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Canning

    573 U.S. 513 (2014)   Cited 279 times   150 Legal Analyses
    Holding that because there was no quorum of validly appointed board members, the NLRB “lacked authority to act,” and the enforcement order was therefore “void ab initio ”

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. Weingarten, Inc.

    420 U.S. 251 (1975)   Cited 434 times   64 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer commits an unfair labor practice by compelling an employee to attend an investigatory meeting that could lead to discipline without allowing the employee to bring a union witness

  3. Detroit Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    440 U.S. 301 (1979)   Cited 228 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union's request for employee aptitude tests was relevant to its claim, but employer's interest in preserving confidentiality was also legitimate, and disclosing the information only upon the employee's written consent was a reasonable accommodation

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  6. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    338 F.3d 267 (4th Cir. 2003)   Cited 9 times
    Noting that "an employee . . . can lose protections if his conduct is so egregious as to take it outside the protection of the Act, or of such a character as to render the employee unfit for further service"

  7. Media Gen. v. N.L.R.B

    560 F.3d 181 (4th Cir. 2009)   Cited 4 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 08-1153, 08-1197. Argued: December 4, 2008. Decided: March 13, 2009. ARGUED: Glenn Edward Plosa, Zinser Law Firm, P.C., Nashville, Tennessee, for Media General Operations, Incorporated, d/b/a The Tampa Tribune. Fred B. Jacob, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, for the National Labor Relations Board. ON BRIEF: L. Michael Zinser, Zinser Law Firm, P.C., Nashville, Tennessee, for Media General Operations, Incorporated, d/b/a The Tampa Tribune. Ronald Meisburg, General Counsel, John

  8. Hotel Emp. Restaurant Emp. Un. v. N.L.R.B

    760 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 26 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Rossmore House, 269 NLRB 1176

  9. United States v. Ray

    351 F.2d 554 (4th Cir. 1965)   Cited 9 times

    No. 9969. Argued October 6, 1965. Decided October 11, 1965. L. Hugh West, Jr., Statesville, N.C. (Court-assigned counsel), for appellant. Wm. Medford, U.S. Atty. (James O. Israel, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., on brief), for appellee. Before BOREMAN and J. SPENCER BELL, Circuit Judges, and MARTIN, District Judge. PER CURIAM. Defendant Ray was found guilty of transporting a stolen motor vehicle in interstate commerce in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2312. He asserts a violation of his Sixth Amendment right to