§

Pacific Abrasive Supply Co.

182 N.L.R.B. 329 (N.L.R.B. 1970)
Pacific Abrasive Supply Co.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,038 times   71 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  3. Snow v. N.L.R.B

    308 F.2d 687 (9th Cir. 1962)   Cited 30 times
    In Snow, both the employer and the Union chose the clergyman who ran the check and he compared signatures, not just names.

  4. Independent, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    406 F.2d 203 (5th Cir. 1969)   Cited 19 times

    No. 24901. January 22, 1969. Frederick S. Kullman, Kullman Lang, New Orleans, La., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Robert S. Hillman, Nan C. Bases, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before DYER and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges, and CABOT, District Judge. SIMPSON, Circuit Judge: This action is before the Court upon the petition of Independent, Incorporated, to review and

  5. Wheeler-Van Label Company v. N.L.R.B

    408 F.2d 613 (2d Cir. 1969)   Cited 15 times

    Nos. 344, 345, Dockets 32707, 32855. Argued February 12, 1969. Decided March 19, 1969. A. Terry Van Houten, Rochester, N.Y. (Harris, Beach, Wilcox, Dale Linowitz, Rochester, N.Y., on the brief), for petitioner. Herman M. Levy, Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, on the brief), for respondent. Before ANDERSON and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges, and MANSFIELD, District Judge. Of the Southern

  6. N.L.R.B. v. United Mineral Chemical Corp.

    391 F.2d 829 (2d Cir. 1968)   Cited 14 times
    In United Mineral & Chemical Corp., the Second Circuit stated that the fact-finder could validly conclude based on witness testimony that the theft had not occurred. 391 F.2d at 833.

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Frick Company

    397 F.2d 956 (3d Cir. 1968)   Cited 12 times
    In NLRB v. Frick Co., 397 F.2d 956 (3d Cir. 1968), the company's vacation plan provided that "[n]o vacation or vacation pay will be allowed or paid to any person who is not on the payroll of the Company on Wednesday preceding the week in which vacation pay is distributed."

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Preston Feed Corporation

    309 F.2d 346 (4th Cir. 1962)   Cited 12 times

    No. 8555. Argued May 30, 1962. Decided October 5, 1962. Melvin J. Welles, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Peter M. Giesey, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, on the brief), for petitioner. William B. Devaney, Washington, D.C. (Charles V. Wehner, Kingwood, W. Va., and Steptoe Johnson, Charleston, W. Va., on the brief), for respondent. Before SOBELOFF, Chief Judge

  9. N.L.R.B. v. World Carpets of New York, Inc.

    403 F.2d 408 (2d Cir. 1968)   Cited 4 times

    No. 99, Docket 32233. Argued October 8, 1968. Decided November 8, 1968. Richard S. Rodin and David C. Nevins, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel; Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel; Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Bertrand B. Pogrebin, Mineola, N.Y., Rains, Pogrebin Scher, Mineola, N.Y., for respondent. Before FRIENDLY, ANDERSON and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges. FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of an order requiring

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Harris-Woodson Co.

    179 F.2d 720 (4th Cir. 1950)   Cited 18 times
    In NLRB v. Harris-Woodson Co., 179 F.2d 720 (4th Cir. 1950), and Continental Oil Co. v. NLRB, 113 F.2d 473 (10th Cir. 1940), the court simply agreed with the Board's judgment, which presumably had support in the record, that the identity of the bargaining representative was preserved after affiliation.