§

Paceco, A Division of Fruehauf Corp.

247 N.L.R.B. 1405 (N.L.R.B. 1980)
Paceco, A Division of Fruehauf Corp.

3 Cited authorities

  1. Bourne v. N.L.R.B

    332 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 93 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Bourne, we held that interrogation which does not contain express threats is not an unfair labor practice unless certain "fairly severe standards" are met showing that the very fact of interrogation was coercive.

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Camco, Incorporated

    340 F.2d 803 (5th Cir. 1965)   Cited 76 times
    Holding that knowledge of union activities could be inferred from the fact that an employer discharged eleven of sixteen union adherents without discharging any of its remaining seventy-four employees

  3. Paceco v. N.L.R.B

    601 F.2d 180 (5th Cir. 1979)   Cited 11 times
    In Paceco, as here, the employer contended that its rules may have only technically violated the Act and it had attempted to rewrite them to remove the defect.