P & M Cedar Products, Inc.
3 Cited authorities
Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
482 U.S. 27 (1987) Cited 369 times 12 Legal AnalysesHolding that the new employer must bargain with the old union, if the new employer is a true successor, and discussing factors
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.
406 U.S. 272 (1972) Cited 478 times 49 Legal AnalysesHolding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement
N.L.R.B. v. Fall River Dyeing Finishing Corp.
775 F.2d 425 (1st Cir. 1985) Cited 7 timesNo. 85-1019. Argued June 6, 1985. Decided October 18, 1985. Ira Drogin, New York City, with whom Leaf, Sternklar Drogin, New York City, was on brief for respondent. William M. Bernstein, Washington, D.C., with whom Elinor Hadley Stillman, Rosemary M. Collyer, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on brief for petitioner. Petition from the National Labor Relations Board