§

P. A. Hayes, Inc.

226 N.L.R.B. 230 (N.L.R.B. 1976)
P. A. Hayes, Inc.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 734 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

  2. Textile Workers v. Darlington Co.

    380 U.S. 263 (1965)   Cited 168 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has the absolute right, at least as far as the NLRA is concerned, to terminate his entire business for any reason

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Strong

    393 U.S. 357 (1969)   Cited 116 times
    Explaining that, though broad, the NLRA's grant of remedial power "does not authorize punitive measures"

  4. In re the Arbitration between Bressette & International Talc Co.

    527 F.2d 211 (2d Cir. 1975)   Cited 26 times
    Holding arbitrable a dispute over whether company's termination of business violated the CBA where arbitration clause did not exclude this dispute

  5. Local 57, Int. L. Garment W. U. v. N.L.R.B

    374 F.2d 295 (D.C. Cir. 1967)   Cited 24 times

    Nos. 19478, 19624. Argued February 11, 1966. Decided January 11, 1967. Certiorari Denied June 5, 1967. See 87 S.Ct. 2074, 2078. Mr. Max Zimny, New York City, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Mr. Morris P. Glushien, New York City, was on the brief, for petitioner in No. 19478. Messrs. John A. McGuinn, Washington, D.C., and Joseph A. Perkins, Miami, Fla., with whom Mr. Guy Farmer, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioners in

  6. Plumbers Loc. U.N. 519, Miami Fla. v. Serv. Plbg.

    401 F. Supp. 1008 (S.D. Fla. 1975)   Cited 11 times
    Holding provision valid

  7. Local 1912, Int. v. U.S. Potash

    270 F.2d 496 (10th Cir. 1959)   Cited 26 times

    No. 6021. September 2, 1959. George W. Christensen, Washington, D.C. (A.T. Montoya, Albuquerque, N.M., on the brief), for appellant. Rufus G. Poole, Albuquerque, N.M. (James W. Stagner, Carlsbad, N.M., and Robert C. Poole, Albuquerque, N.M., on the brief), for appellee. Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and PICKETT and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judges. MURRAH, Chief Judge. The appellant-Union brought this suit under Section 301(a) of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, 61 Stat. 156, 29 U.S.C.A. § 185

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Hyde

    339 F.2d 568 (9th Cir. 1965)   Cited 13 times

    No. 19350. December 15, 1964. Rehearing Denied February 4, 1965. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison, George B. Driesen, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Gunther F. Krause, Portland, Willard K. Carey, La Grande, Fredric R. Merrill, Krause, Lindsay Nahstoll, Portland, Or., for respondent. Before POPE, HAMLEY and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges. HAMLEY, Circuit Judge: This case is before

  9. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,109 times   35 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"